Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions| Reviewers

Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 808    
     


 
Table of Contents   
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 92-96
Mandibular hypo-hyperdontia: A report of three cases


1 Pedodontics and Preventive dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Dentistry, Abhiram Institute of Medical Sciences, Atmakur, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication29-Nov-2013

Correspondence Address:
Sreekanth Kumar Mallineni
Dentistry, Abhiram Institute of Medical Sciences, Atmakur, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.122451

Rights and Permissions

   Abstract 

Dental anomalies of tooth number in development of the permanent dentition are quite common than the primary dentition, however, the combined occurrence of hypodontia and hyperdontia is a rare phenomenon, especially in the same dental arch. The purpose of this report is to describe a case of concomitant hypo-hyperdontia (CHH) in three patients (one girl and two boys) with missing mandibular central incisor and an erupted mandibular mesiodens. Three rare cases of mandibular CHH were observed during routine examination, where the two anomalies manifested in the anterior region of the mandible. Furthermore, these are the only cases exhibited taurodontism in association with mandibular CHH.


Keywords: Hyperdontia, hypodontia, taurodontism


How to cite this article:
Nirmala S, Sandeep C, Nuvvula S, Mallineni SK. Mandibular hypo-hyperdontia: A report of three cases. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2013;3:92-6

How to cite this URL:
Nirmala S, Sandeep C, Nuvvula S, Mallineni SK. Mandibular hypo-hyperdontia: A report of three cases. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Feb 24];3:92-6. Available from: http://www.jispcd.org/text.asp?2013/3/2/92/122451



   Introduction Top


Agenesis of one or more teeth in primary or permanent dentition is known as hypodontia, while, hyperdontia is a condition that of having extra to the normal complement of teeth. Hypodontia and hyperdontia are two extremes in the development of the dentitions. The occurrence of both these identities in the same individual is a form of combined numeric variation. Although, the existing literature shows exclusively either hyperdontia or hypodontia, however, only a few studies have been accounted the incidence of both the anomalies. [1],[2] The term "concomitant hypo-hyperdontia" (CHH) has been used to describe the occurrence in the same individual. [3]

The aetiology of CHH remains unclear and it is not evidently documented in the literature. While, environmental and genetic factors have been anticipated to explain the occurrence of these anomalies. Furthermore, CHH has been reported in patients with Down syndrome, Dubowitz syndrome,  Ellis-van Creveld syndrome More Details, fucosidosis, G/BBB syndrome, Marfan syndrome and cleft lip and palate. [4]

The reported prevalence was between 0.002% and 3.1%, most of these were of CHH involved both the arches. [1] Most of these cases were identified accidentally and/or regular examination. Most recently, it has been reported by several authors the combination of both hypodontia and hyperdontia in both arches. The occurrence of CHH in the same dental arch in a healthy patient is most likely to be a rare phenomenon and all existing reports are reported in the maxilla. [1],[4],[5] The occurrence of CHH in the mandibular arch is extremely rare, however, most recently few cases has been reported on this identity involving congenitally missing both central incisors. The purpose of this article is to review the literature and to describe three rare identities of CHH in the anterior region of the mandibular arch.


   Case Reports Top


This was a case report of three patients (one female and two males) attended to the Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry as regular walk-in patients. Medical histories and family histories were unremarkable and all patients were full term babies born to parents of a non-consanguineous marriage. There was no history of infection, metabolic disorders and trauma, in their childhood. All our patients were attended 1 st time to our dental clinic for examination, among these one patient (female) received restorations by a private dentist. Intra-oral examination revealed that all our patients were in mixed dentition. Oral hygiene was adequate, absence of the mandibular central incisor tooth 41 and presence of a microdontic tooth in the midline was evident which was conical in shape [Figure 1] (Case 1) and [Figure 2] (Case 2)]. The normal morphology of the clinical crowns of the three incisors was evident. On radiographic examination, the panoramic radiographs revealed that the conical shaped tooth was with complete root formation and no periapical changes were evident [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]. Based on its appearance and size it was diagnosed as supernumerary tooth (SNT). Taurodontism was evident in permanent first molars of two patients. Other findings were normal considering the patients age. The approximation of the roots of the SNT and incisors, no spacing was present in between the incisors which highlighted the absence of the incisor in all three cases. Both clinical and radiographic examinations revealed that the absence of tooth 41and the presence of a SNT in the tooth 41 region. The diagnosis of mandibular CHH was made in three case based on the history, clinical and radiological investigations. All the patient parents were informed and options were given for the management of conical shape SNT. The options that were considered were composite restoration, single unit crown and resin-bonded bridge on the short-term basis and implants followed by extraction on long-term. The patients underwent a complete physical examination to evaluate the syndromic features that were not identified. Esthetics were given priority and the patients were advised rehabilitation for the anterior teeth spacing; however, two (Case 2 and 3) of patients refused any intervention and was satisfied with their current dentition. One patient (Case 1) gone through scaling and restorations for the mandibular first permanent molars and he has been kept under review.
Figure 1: Occlusal view of the mandible showing supernumerary tooth in tooth 41 region (Case 1)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Occlusal view of the mandible showing supernumerary tooth in tooth 41 region (Case 2)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Panoramic radiograph (Case 1) showing the congenitally missing tooth 41, presence of mandibular mesiodens and taurodontism in first permanent molars at 8.5 years

Click here to view
Figure 4: Panoramic radiograph (Case 2) showing congenitally missing tooth 41 and presence of mandibular mesiodens at 10.9 years

Click here to view
Figure 5: Panoramic radiograph (Case 3) showing congenitally missing tooth 41, presence of mandibular mesiodens and taurodontism in first permanent molars at 9.2 years

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Gibson [6] divided hypo-hyperdontia as pre-maxillary, maxillary, mandibular and bi-maxillary hypo-hyperdontia based on the site of occurrence. The three cases described in this article are good examples of mandibular CHH excluding the third molars in both the arches. Garn et al. [7] have discussed the association of third molar agenesis with missing teeth from other classes of teeth. The authors concluded that the association among the reduction in the number of other teeth and third molars hysterics the hypothesis of a field of variable intensity, which, in its greatest degree of expression, eliminates all four third molar teeth. The distribution of missing third molars in the present report was teeth 18 and 28 (Case 1), 18, 28 and 48 (Case 2) and tooth 18 (Case 3) accordingly, if, third molars were taken in to account these cases were considered as bi-maxillary CHH.

Several hypothesis, including atavism, dichotomy, hyperactivity of the dental lamina and the concept of multi-factorial inheritance, have been proposed to elucidate the formation of SNT that are common in males. Similarly, several theories have been propagated on the tooth agenesis; the conception of a polygenic multi-factorial model of etiology still provides a good explanation for hypodontia, which is common in females [1] . However, the etiology of CHH remains unclear. Additionally, there is no family history in three cases was evident, it has been recommended that disturbances in differentiation, migration and proliferation of neural crest cells was associated with interactions between the epithelial and the mesenchymal cells during the initiation of odontogenesis may be responsible for CHH. [1],[2],[3] A recent study from Poland reported that CHH is rare and sex-related, with a predominance of hypodontia. [8]

SNT may be single or multiple, unilateral or bilateral in distribution, can occur in both dental arches and either in the primary mixed or permanent dentitions. The mesiodens in maxillary arch are the most commonly occurring SNT type followed by mandibular supplemental premolars [9] . Contrarily, the cases in the report exhibited SNT in the anterior region of the mandible. Occurrence of SNT in the mandibular anterior region is exceedingly rare condition, but when they do occur, they appear as one or more smaller cone-shaped teeth.

Excluding third molars mandibular second premolars were the most commonly missing in Caucasian population, whereas, mandibular incisors in Asian populations [10] . It has also been reported that the unilateral form of missing teeth were more common. Similarly, in three cases one mandibular incisor was missing congenitally.

Most recently Zadurska et al. [5] reported that the occurrence of CHH in both jaws or in the maxilla and the authors stated that CHH never occur only in the mandible. Nevertheless, this condition in mandibular anterior region has been reported [2],[8],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16] [Table 1], where both mandibular central incisors were missing with the presence of SNT in the midline. In contrast, in present cases only one mandibular central incisor was missing with the presence of a SNT. Therefore, it is surprising to note that occurrence of agenesis of unilateral central incisor exhibited in all cases with the presence of SNT. This concurs with the reported findings that a SNT seldom approaches or equals normal tooth size and shape, microdontic and conical shaped mandibular incisors are extremely rare.
Table 1: Details of the three cases presented with mandibular hypo-hyperdontia along with published cases

Click here to view


Taurodontism has been frequently reported with the incidence rate of 0.25% and 18%. [17] Several authors have studied the association among taurodontism and hypodontia. Seow and Lai [18] reported 34.8% of patients affected by hypodontia had taurodontism while Gomes et al. [19] found one-third of their patients. It has been reported that taurodontism has been associated with CHH [20] ; similarly, in the present report two of our patients with CHH exhibited taurodontism in maxillary first permanent molars. Furthermore, most recently densevaginatus [21] and double tooth [22] have been reported in association with CHH.

The standard treatment protocols have not been discussed for the management of CHH in literature and a multidisciplinary approach is necessary; hence, the management of CHH is quite challenging. In the present scenario, no treatment, extraction of mesiodens and close the space with fixed orthodontics, extraction of mesiodens and Maryland bridge as short-term and implants in feature and composite build-up to mimic as incisor, were treatment options included. Among our patients two were declined the treatment and one patient received treatment. It was decided to have aesthetic restoration for the mandibular anterior region. Early diagnosis is a key for the successful management, since it permits the dentist to implement the most appropriative treatment options for the patient to minimize consequences. The treatments may differ from individual to individual.

The diagnosis of CHH in all our cases was only an incidental finding, which is similar to most of the findings that have been reported. Moreover, it has been stated that a high proportion of patients with CHH may remain undiagnosed in the population. [4] The cases in the present report created a dilemma for the first instance in a clinical scenario and it is very difficult to diagnosis the CHH in a growing child. Our three cases exhibited mesiodens in tooth 41 region, which was coincidental and the size and shape of the tooth in 41 regions was completely different than usual appearance of mandibular central incisor. The panoramic evaluations of these cases confirm the findings. Clinical examination along with radiographic evaluation drew the proper diagnosis of the dilemma in our cases. It has also been sugested that the use of radiograph along with the clinical examination may enhance the recognition of CHH which probably could modify in the treatment plan. [1],[2],[3]


   Conclusion Top


CHH is an unusual condition and occurrence in the mandibular arch is extremely rare. Moreover, this condition which might be diagnosed by routine clinical and radiographic examinations. Agenesis of unilateral mandibular incisor, with the presence of SNT in the anterior region of the mandible is extremely rare. The present cases are unique cases of mandibular CHH. Furthermore, taurodontism associations with CHH have been evident, which needed further discussion.

 
   References Top

1.Anthonappa RP, Lee CK, Yiu CK, King NM. Hypohyperdontia: Literature review and report of seven cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:e24-30.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Nuvvula S, Kiranmayi M, Shilpa G, Nirmala SV. Hypohyperdontia: Agenesis of three third molars and mandibular centrals associated with midline supernumerary tooth in mandible. Contemp Clin Dent 2010;1:136-41.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
3.Camilleri GE. Concomitant hypodontia and hyperodontia. Case report. Br Dent J 1967;123:338-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Mallineni SK, Jayaraman J, Yiu CK, King NM. Concomitant occurrence of hypohyperdontia in a patient with Marfan syndrome: A review of the literature and report of a case. J Investig Clin Dent 2012;3:253-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Zadurska M, Sieminska-Piekarczyk B, Maciejak D, Wyszomirska-Zdybel B, Kurol J. Concomitant hypodontia and hyperodontia: An analysis of nine patients. Acta Odontol Scand 2012;70:154-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Gibson AC. Concomitant hypo-hyperodontia. Br J Orthod 1979;6:101-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Garn SM, Lewis AB, Vicinus JH. Third molar polymorphism and its significance to dental genetics. J Dent Res 1963;42:Suppl 1344-63.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Nayak AG, Chhaparwal Y, Pai KM, Lele AS. Non-syndromic hypo-hyperdontia of the permanent dentition with involvement of the mandibular anterior region: a rare occurrence. Rev Clín Pesq Odontol 2010;6:281-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Mallineni SK. Radiographic localization of supernumerary teeth in the maxilla. [MDS Thesis] Hongkong: University of HongKong; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Polder BJ, Van't Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:217-26.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Low T. Hypodontia and supernumerary tooth: Report of a case and its management. Br J Orthod 1977;4:187-90.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Das G, Sarkar S, Bhattacharya B, Saha N. Coexistent partial anodontia and supernumerary tooth in the mandibular arch: A rare case. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2006;24 Suppl 1:S33-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Verma KG, Verma P, Rishi S. Case report: A rare occurrence of non-syndromic hypo-hyperdontia in the mandibular anterior region. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2012;13:47-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Raghavan VH. Mandibular mesiodens with agenesis of central incisors-A rare association. Niger Dent J 2009;17:27-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Venkataraghavan K, Muralikrishnan B, Anantharaj A. Mandibular mesiodens with agenesis of central incisors (Hypohyperdontia): A case report and review. Int J Contemp Dent 2011;2:26-30.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Marya CM, Sharma G, Parashar VP, Dahiya V, Gupta A. Mandibular midline supernumerary tooth associated with agenesis of permanent central incisors: A diagnostic conundrum. Stomatologija 2012;14:65-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Ruprecht A, Batniji S, el-Neweihi E. The incidence of taurodontism in dental patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:743-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Seow WK, Lai PY. Association of taurodontism with hypodontia: A controlled study. Pediatr Dent 1989;11:214-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Gomes RR, da Fonseca JA, Paula LM, Faber J, Acevedo AC. Prevalence of hypodontia in orthodontic patients in Brasilia, Brazil. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:302-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Nirmala SV, Mallineni SK, Nuvvula S. Pre-maxillary hypo-hyperdontia: Report of a rare case. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2013;54:443-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Manjunatha BS, Nagarajappa D, Singh SK. Concomitant hypo-hyperdontia with dens invaginatus. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:468-71.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
22.Sharma A. Concomitant hypo-hyperdontia: Report of two cases. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:700.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Pre-maxillary hypohyperdontia: a report of two cases
L. M. Bowdin,S. Wong,R. P. Anthonappa,N. M. King
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Tiroid Hastaligi ile Birlikte Görülen Nadir Bir Hipo-Hiperdonti Vakasi
Ilkay PEKER,Songul YAPICI
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2017; : 7
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Prevalence of concomitant hypo-hyperdontia in a group of Turkish orthodontic patients
B. Gokkaya,B. Kargul
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2016; 17(1): 53
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 A comprehensive review of the literature and data analysis on hypo-hyperdontia
Sreekanth K. Mallineni,Sivakumar Nuvvula,Alex C. H. Cheung,Radhika Kunduru
Journal of Oral Science. 2014; 56(4): 295
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,288 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Reports
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3188    
    Printed73    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded237    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal