|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 474-479
|Awareness about biomedical waste management and knowledge of effective recycling of dental materials among dental students
Rajeev Ranjan1, Ruchi Pathak1, Dhirendra K Singh1, Md Jalaluddin1, Shobha A Kore2, Abhijeet R Kore3
1 Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
2 Department of Dentistry, Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mayani, Satara, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Sciences, Karad, Maharashtra, India
|Date of Submission||14-Jul-2016|
|Date of Acceptance||14-Sep-2016|
|Date of Web Publication||24-Oct-2016|
Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Aims and Objectives: Biomedical waste management has become a concern with increasing number of dental practitioners in India. Being health care professionals, dentists should be aware regarding safe disposal of biomedical waste and recycling of dental materials to minimize biohazards to the environment. The aim of the present study was to assess awareness regarding biomedical waste management as well as knowledge of effective recycling and reuse of dental materials among dental students. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among dental students belonging from all dental colleges of Bhubaneswar, Odisha (India) from February 2016 to April 2016. A total of 500 students (208 males and 292 females) participated in the study, which was conducted in two phases. A questionnaire was distributed to assess the awareness of biomedical waste management and knowledge of effective recycling of dental materials, and collected data was examined on a 5-point unipolar scale in percentages to assess the relative awareness regarding these two different categorizes. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences was used to analyzed collected data. Results: Forty-four percent of the dental students were not at all aware about the management of biomedical waste, 22% were moderately aware, 21% slightly aware, 7% very aware, and 5% fell in extremely aware category. Similarly, a higher percentage of participants (61%) were completely unaware regarding recycling and reusing of biomedical waste. Conclusion: There is lack of sufficient knowledge among dental students regarding management of biomedical waste and recycling or reusing of dental materials. Considering its impact on the environment, biomedical waste management requires immediate academic assessment to increase the awareness during training courses.
Keywords: Biomedical waste, dental materials, recycling
|How to cite this article:|
Ranjan R, Pathak R, Singh DK, Jalaluddin M, Kore SA, Kore AR. Awareness about biomedical waste management and knowledge of effective recycling of dental materials among dental students. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2016;6:474-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Ranjan R, Pathak R, Singh DK, Jalaluddin M, Kore SA, Kore AR. Awareness about biomedical waste management and knowledge of effective recycling of dental materials among dental students. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Jul 18];6:474-9. Available from: http://www.jispcd.org/text.asp?2016/6/5/474/192941
| Introduction|| |
Health care industry is one of the leading industries worldwide, and in India it is growing by leaps and bounds. Increased life expectancy, greater health awareness, and increased precedence of lifestyle diseases have been key contributors to this growth. The Indian health care sector includes corporate hospitals, private clinics, and medical and dental colleges that generate biomedical waste. This includes human and animal anatomical waste and treatment apparatus such as syringes and needles, as well as various materials used in the health sector in the process of diagnosis, treatment, and research. Biomedical waste is generated in hospitals, nursing homes, blood bank, and pathological laboratories during diagnosis, treatment, or immunization of various diseases.
The generation of a comparatively large amount of potentially infectious and hazardous waste has increased in the healthcare services. According to a survey conducted by the Indian Society of Hospital Waste Management in June 2016, the quantum of waste that is generated in India is estimated to be 1–2 kg per bed per day in a hospital and 600 g per day per bed in a general practitioner's clinic. The overall waste generated throughout the country increased from 415429 kg in 2011 to 484271 kg per day in 2013. Karnataka was the highest producer of biowaste at 83614 kg per day, followed by Maharashtra, which produced 65660 kg of biowaste every day. Kerala was the third highest producer of biomedical waste in 2013 with the generation of 47223.84 kg per day.
A major issue related to current biomedical waste management in many hospitals is that the implementation of biowaste regulation is unsatisfactory. Alarmingly, most of the produced biomedical waste is either incinerated or dumped in landfills or let off in the nearest water body untreated. Improper waste disposal has led to numerous health hazards such as injuries from sharps, development of nosocomial infections in patients particularly human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B and C, and emergence of resistant strains of microorganisms.
In year 2002, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported biomedical waste practices in India. WHO reported that 50% reuse of biomedical waste products such as needles and syringes, which are meant for single use. The Ministry of Environment and Forests of Government of India first proposed biomedical wastes rules on 20th July 1998. On 24th August 2011, the 1998 rules were amended and uniform guidelines and code of practice for management of biomedical waste were given to include all persons who generate, collect, receive, store, and transport biomedical waste. New guideline consists of 1–17 rules, I–VI schedules, and I–VI forms. New regulation clearly states that the “occupier” of an institution/hospital/clinics generating biomedical waste shall be responsible for taking required steps to ensure that such biowaste is handled without any adverse effect to human health and the environment. The 2011 draft demarcated 8 categories of biomedical waste (down from 10 categories in the 1998 notification). Sound management of biomedical waste is thus a crucial component of environmental protection. Healthcare facilities must employ effective treatment and disposal technologies.
There were two aspects of this present study. One aspect was to identify the level of awareness regarding biomedical waste management among dental students of Bhubaneswar city, at the primary level of dental professional training, which actually elucidate the level of teaching about
this important aspect. The second aspect of study was related with knowledge of dental students in regards to effective recycling and reuse of dental materials.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The study was carried out after obtaining required clearance from the Research and Ethics committee of the university. An informed consent was obtained from each participant for the study after detailed explanation of the study procedure. This study included all the students belonging to third and final year as well as the interns enrolled in the Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) professional course from three dental colleges of Bhubaneswar. A universal sample of 600 students from all these three colleges made up the sample population. Out of this study population, 500 participants consented or were available during the study. A response rate of 80% was recorded for this study. The study was carried out from September 2015 to December 2015.
A pre-tested questionnaire was taken from a similar study conducted in India. The questionnaire was split into two categories, with 15 definite questions in each category. Questions in the first category were related to biomedical waste management whereas the second category questions were related to the recycling and reuse of dental materials. Reply for each question were then divided into right or wrong, and the summation was calculated for the mean. Collected data was analyzed and a 5-point unipolar scale was used to analyze for the assessment of awareness and knowledge regarding both the categories. This questionnaire was tested for content validity by 15 experts in the field. The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.78 indicating high validity. Face validity was tested by carrying out a pilot study on a sample of 30 participants for assessing the uniformity in interpretation of the questions. Data for all the participants was evaluated using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software system.
| Results|| |
This was a cross-sectional study that included a total of 500 participants, 208 males and 292 females, belonging to all three dental colleges of Bhubaneswar city. The total duration of the study was approximately 3 months.
The study consisted of two parts. The first part comprised questions to assess the awareness of biomedical waste management, and the second part comprised questions to analyze the knowledge of effective recycling and reuse of dental materials.
When the results pertaining to relative awareness of biomedical waste management were analyzed, it was found that a majority of them gave a positive answer for question numbers 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15, with the highest percentage observed for question number 13 (61.6%) and lowest for question 6 (42.5%). However, for questions 4, 5, 7, and 10 there was a negative reply ranging from 47.5% for question 4 to 40.5% for question 7. A very small percentage of participants, ranging 8.1–17.9% fell into neither of the category [Table 1]; [Graph 1 [Additional file 1]].
The second part of the study also contained 15 questions. Only question number 1 (75.4%) and 14 (45.5%) had a positive reply. Except for question number 7, 8, 9, and 15, all fell in the “No” category with 56.5% for question 4 to 35.9% for question 12.
Question number 8 saw a higher percentage (45.3%) of participants in the “can't say” category when compared to other two categories [Table 2]; [Graph 2 [Additional file 2]].
|Table 2: Analysis of awareness about recycling and reusing of dental materials|
Click here to view
The entire collected data were evaluated using a 5-point unipolar scale for the assessment of awareness and knowledge in both the categories. Of the entire study participants, 44% were not aware about the management of biomedical waste, 22% were moderately aware, 21% slightly aware, 7% very aware, and 6% fell in the extremely aware category. Similarly, a higher percentage of participants (60%) were completely unaware regarding recycling and reusing of biomedical waste. Approximately, 27%, 6%, 4%, and 3% fell in the slightly aware, moderately aware, very aware, and extremely aware categories, respectively [Table 3]; [Graph 3 [Additional file 3]].
|Table 3: 5-point unipolar scales for assessing awareness in both categories|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Considerable amount of biomedical waste is generated in dental practices, which can be hazardous to the environment, as well as to those who come in contact with these materials, if not dealt with appropriately. According to the WHO fact sheet, approximately 20% of waste generated by various health care units is reported to be hazardous. Rapid urbanization and population growth has led to more and more number of hospitals and private clinics. With the increase in health care facilities, comes the generation of surplus amount of biomedical waste. The more serious situation in future may arise due to the toxicity and unavailability of dumping grounds for such wastes.
In densely populated developing countries, management of biomedical waste is a complicated issue and should be planned in advance. Concern about the release of greenhouse gases during incineration of biomedical waste has also grown, which ultimately causes environmental harm and global warming. Many studies from developing countries have been documented in the literature showing inadequacy of knowledge and indigent attitude among health care workers regarding biomedical waste. These studies have been reported from India,, Brazil, Dhaka, and Turkey. These studies were mainly focused on biomedical waste management, but did not discuss recycling of waste. There are no studies reported in India regarding the awareness of biomedical waste management among dental students undergoing training.
From this study, it was found that 44% of study populations were not aware about the management of biomedical waste. This is in accordance to studies done by Sreegiri et al., Mathur et al., and Sood et al., where the awareness was very less about biomedical waste management.,, According to a study done by Narang et al., a higher percentage of studying participants, almost 89%, were not aware about biomedical waste management. This shows the relative negligence among health care workers regarding this issue.,
Hazards of improper management of biomedical waste have increased the concerned throughout the world, considering its deleterious effects on human health and ecosystem. Improper waste disposal by hospitals, nursing homes, and health care institutions have increased the concern about this. In the present study, it was found that most of the health care workers were unaware about the six effective steps for proper waste disposal or the type of incinerator used and the toxic gases produced from these incinerators that contributes to further global warming. Same results have been reported by Babu in his review on management of biomedical waste. Authors have emphasized the urgent need for education about the hazards of biomedical waste to the health care workers.,
Regarding knowledge pertaining to the recycling and reuse of dental materials, 61% of the study population was completely clueless about this issue. Most of them were unaware about the proper disposal of dental amalgam, which is considered to be a major environmental hazard, and about the recycling and reuse of gypsum products, which are abundantly used in dentistry. The results of this study are similar to studies done by Tippat et al.
Mercury and their products should be recycled carefully in dental setting. To decrease chances of mercury toxicity the use of chair side trap, amalgam capture devices, vacuum pump filter should be used to retrieve amalgam in dental setting. The American Dental Association recommends that excess amalgam should be stored under a small amount of “photographic fixer” in a closed container to minimize its hazard, and then it should be sent for recycling.
Gypsum and byproducts used for dental work should not in any way be considered as land filler material considering the release of hydrogen sulfide gases from it. It deteriorates soil properties by reducing soil crusting and by increasing soil aeration and water infiltration. Other dental materials that can be reused are metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets, phosphate-bonded investments, alginate, unused dental alloys (incorporated with Ag, Au, or Pd), and dental gold. Lack of awareness about biomedical waste management and effective knowledge of recycling of dental materials among students might be associated with low emphasis given on these topics during dental graduation course. There is a need for more studies in future to determine the exact cause of low awareness regarding biomedical waste management and effective knowledge of recycling or reuse of dental materials among the dental fraternity.
| Conclusion|| |
Our country has a huge medical infrastructure. With increasing number of hospitals and medical and dental colleges opening, improper disposal of biomedical can lead to significant environment and health related hazards. Thus, adequate knowledge about this is essential. This study shows that there is lack of sufficient knowledge among dental students regarding biomedical waste management and/or recycling of dental materials. For this, immediate academic assessment to increase the awareness is required during training courses. Thus, small advances need to be made in this aspect to reap great and huge benefits.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Baghele ON, Phadke S, Deshpande AA, Deshpande JP, Baghele MO. A simplified model for biomedical waste management in dental practices-A pilot project at Thane, India. Eur J Gen Dent 2013;2:235-40.
Ghasemi MK, Yusuff RB. Advantages and Disadvantages of Healthcare Waste Treatment and Disposal Alternatives: Malaysian Scenario. Pol J Environ Stud 2016;25:17-25.
Mathur P, Patan S, Shobhawat AS. Need of Biomedical Waste Management System in Hospitals-An Emerging issue. Curr World Environ 2012;7:117-24.
Mattoo K, Singh V, Garg R. Are Dental Training Programs Heading towards Ecological Disaster – Results from a Survey. J Atmos Pol 2014;2:17-21.
Sharma A, Sharma V, Sharma S, Singh P. Awareness of Biomedical Waste Management Among Health Care Personnel in Jaipur, India. Oral Health Dent Manag 2013;12:32-40.
Thota MM, Bathala LR, Theruru K, Shaik S, Jupidi B, Rayapati S. There's plenty of room at the bottom: The biomedical waste management in dentistry. J Dr. NTR Univ Health Sci 2014;3:149-55.
Pandit NB, Mehta HK, Kartha GP, Choudhary SK. Management of Bio-medical Waste: Awareness and Practices in a District of Gujarat. Indian J Public Health 2005;4:245-7.
Vilas MA. A Critical Overview of Legal Profile on Solid Waste Management in India Int J Res Chem Environ 2015;5:1-16.
Atiyat N, Mosa M. Environmental impact assessment for domestic solid waste landfill project. Environmental Research Center: Royal Scientific Society; 2002.
Sharma S. Awareness about bio-medical waste management among health care personnel of some important medical centres in Agra. Int J Environ Sci Dev 2010;1:251-5.
Sushma MK, Bhat S, Shetty SR, Babu SG. Bio-medical dental waste management and awareness of waste management policy among private dental practitioners in Mangalore City, India. Tanzania Dent J 2010;16:39-43.
Da Silva CE, Hoppe AE, Ravanello MM, Mello N. Medical waste management in the south of Brazil. Waste Manag 2005;25:600-60.
Hassan MM, Ahmed SA, Rahman KA, Biswas TK. Pattern of medical waste management: Existing scenario in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 2008;8:36.
Alagöz AZ, Kocasoy G. Improvement and modification of the routing system for the health-care waste collection and transportation in Istanbul. Waste Manag 2008;28:1461-71.
Mathur V, Dwivedi S, Hassan MA, Misra RP. Knowledge, attitude and practices about Bio-medical waste management among health care personnel: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Comm Med 2011;36:143-5.
Sood AG, Sood A. Dental perspective on biomedical waste and mercury management: A knowledge, attitude and practice survey. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:371-375.
Sreegiri S, Krishna Babu G. Bio-medical waste management in a tertiary level hospital in Visakhapatnam. Indian J Comm Med 2009;5:1-6.
Narang RS, Manchanda A, Singh S, Verma N, Padda S. Awareness of biomedical waste management among dental professionals and auxiliary staff in Amritsar, India. Oral Health Dent Manag 2012;11:162-168.
Babu BR, Parande AK, Rajalakshmi R, Suriyakala P, Volga M. Management of Biomedical Waste in India and Other Countries: A Review. J Int Environ Appl Sci 2009;4:65-78.
Abhishek KN, Suryavanshi HN, Sam G, Chaithanya KH, Punde P, Singh SS. Management of Biomedical Waste: An Exploratory Study. J Int Oral Health 2015;7:70-4.
Singh RD, Jurel SK, Tripathi S, Agrawal KK, Kumari R. Mercury and Other Biomedical Waste Management Practices among Dental Practitioners in India. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:272750.
Tippat SK, Pachkhade AU. Survey of Bio-Medical Waste Disposal System in Some Hospitals of Amravati City. IJCPS 2015;4:530-5.
Adams E. Eco-friendly dentistry: Not a matter of choice. Can Dent Assoc 2007;73:581-4.
Mercury in dental amalgam. Available from:
http://www.epa.gov/hg/dentalamalgam.html#bmps. [Last accessed on 2011 Aug 8].
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||A Study of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of Personnel in Clinic Regarding Infectious Waste Management Case Study: Mueang Phuket District, Phuket
| ||Husna Romin,Pensiri Akkajit |
| ||International Journal of Environmental Science and Development. 2018; 9(6): 152 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Green dentistry: a systematic review of ecological dental practices
| ||Sunali S. Khanna,Prita A. Dhaimade |
| ||Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||1870 |
| Printed||27 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||114 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||2 |