Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions| Reviewers

Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 951    
     


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 191-196
Parental perception of oral health-related quality of life of Syrian refugee children


1 Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Research Center, Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Date of Submission11-Jun-2017
Date of Acceptance10-Jul-2017
Date of Web Publication31-Jul-2017

Correspondence Address:
Sharat Chandra Pani
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy, Riyadh
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_212_17

Rights and Permissions

   Abstract 

Aims and Objectives: The conflict in Syria has resulted in the displacement of over 5 million people, many of whom intend to return home at the cessation of hostilities. Oral health plays a critical role in early childhood and this study aimed to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of these children.
Materials and Methods: The quantitative assessment of OHRQoL was done using a validated Arabic version of the short-form Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire-8 (P-CPQ-8). The P-CPQ-8 was administered to 22 sets of parents of children in a community center catering to urban refugees. A focus group interview and thematic analysis of nine mothers were used to gain a qualitative insight into the problems that could affect the OHRQoL of their children.
Results: The P-CPQ-8 revealed that oral symptoms were the greatest concern of the parents with dental pain being the most commonly reported condition. Although mothers reported higher P-CPQ-8 scores among all domains than fathers, there were no significant differences in the concerns of the fathers and the mothers. The focus group interview raised three major themes - (1) access to dental care, (2) pain felt by the child, and (3) oral hygiene of the child.
Conclusion: The parents interviewed in this study were aware of the importance of oral hygiene but reported being unable to look after their children's teeth. Children who are refugees from the Syrian conflict face significant OHRQoL challenges


Keywords: Early childhood, oral health-related quality of life, Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire-8, refugees


How to cite this article:
Pani SC, Al-Sibai SA, Rao AS, Kazimoglu SN, Mosadomi HA. Parental perception of oral health-related quality of life of Syrian refugee children. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2017;7:191-6

How to cite this URL:
Pani SC, Al-Sibai SA, Rao AS, Kazimoglu SN, Mosadomi HA. Parental perception of oral health-related quality of life of Syrian refugee children. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Feb 24];7:191-6. Available from: http://www.jispcd.org/text.asp?2017/7/4/191/211867



   Introduction Top


The conflict in Syria has been raging since 2011 and is estimated to have displaced over 5 million refugees and countless more internally displaced persons.[1],[2] This has led to the largest migration of refugees since the Second World War.[1],[3] Although the crisis of refugees escaping into Europe has received considerable attention in the literature,[1],[3] it must be remembered that the larger bulk of refugees are located in the countries that share land borders with Syria, namely Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey.[4],[5]

It is an established fact that, after the first few years of displacement, health-care concerns of refugees shift from seeking attention for medical emergencies, to the treatment of chronic conditions.[6] Oral health has been shown to be one of the many chronic health conditions that affect the quality of life of refugees.[6],[7],[8] Recent literature on the health status of Syrian refugees seeking health care have identified oral health problems to be a pressing health-care need.[8] Oral health is crucial in early childhood, and long-term oral health problems can result in loss of weight and failure to thrive.[9] A recent review of literature has shown that refugee children are particularly vulnerable to the debilitating effects of oral diseases.[10]

Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is a multidimensional construct that includes a subjective evaluation of the individual's oral health, functional well-being, emotional well-being (EW), expectations and satisfaction with care, and sense of self.[11] The short-form Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire-8 (P-CPQ-8) of a child's oral health is a questionnaire that has been successfully translated and validated in Arabic.[12] However, questionnaires alone do not explore the complexities of quality of life, and the combination of traditional quantitative methods with qualitative interviews has been referred to in literature as mixed method studies and has been shown to be useful in providing an in-depth understanding of physical and psychological impacts of disease.[13]

Studies on the health-care needs of Syrian have reported the significance of oral health.[3],[6],[14] However, there have been few attempts to identify the impact or perception of oral health-care needs on quality of life among the parents of refugee children. This study aimed to use the P-CPQ-8 questionnaire to quantitatively assess OHRQoL among the parents of children aged below 6 years and then use a focus group interview to explore the factors influencing their perceptions of their children's oral health.


   Materials and Methods Top


Ethical approval and confidentiality

The ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy FRP/2016/218 as well as permission to conduct the interviews in the HAYAD charitable foundation (Kirikhan, Turkey) which is the organization managing the community center and the clinics. To protect confidentiality of the parents, each parent in the interview was assigned a number and they were not identified by name on any of the recordings or transcripts. The consent to participate in the interview was obtained in the form of recorded verbal assent.

Quantitative assessment of oral health-related quality of life

The parental perception of their children's oral health was recorded using a validated Arabic version of the P-CPQ-8 questionnaire. The questionnaire contains eight questions with two questions in each of the four domains: (a) oral symptoms (OSs), (b) functional limitations (FLs), (c) EW, and (d) social well-being. The parents scored each of the questions on a five-point Likert scale with “never” (0), “once or twice” (1), “sometimes” (2), “often” (3), and “every day or almost every day” (4). The minimum possible score was 0 and the maximum possible score was 32 [Table 1].
Table 1: Parental-Caregivers Perceptions Questionnaires-8 responses of the population*


Click here to view


Qualitative assessment of data

Parents who completed the P-CPQ-8 were then screened purposively to create three subsets; those with low P-CPQ-8 scores (<10), intermediate P-CPQ-8 scores (11–21), and high P-CPQ-8 scores (>21). Three mothers from each category were invited to participate in a focus group interview (n = 9). The interview was conducted in the community hall of the center to place the respondents in a familiar setting. The discussion was conducted and moderated by two of the investigators (SA and AR) who ensured that all the participants contributed to the discussion. The discussion was based on an in-depth interview guide that was prepared by the principal investigator (SCP) and sought to combine the themes of the P-CPQ-8 with existing themes in the literature [Table 2]. The interviews were audio recorded and care was taken not to use real names of any of the participants to ensure confidentiality as previously stated. The recorded interviews were transcribed into Arabic and translated into English by two bilingual investigators (SA and SK) using the Cross-Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures to ensure consistency and congruity of all data. These measures included the following steps: (1) preparation, (2) forward translation, (3) Reconciliation, (4) back translation, (5) back translation review, (6) harmonization, (7) cognitive debriefing, (8) review of cognitive debriefing results and finalization, (9) proofreading, and (10) final report.[15]
Table 2: Question guide for the focus group interview


Click here to view


Sample selection

An invitation to participate in the study was given out to fifty convenient sets of parents of children below the age of 6 years. Parents who consented to participate in the study were asked to fill in the Arabic short-form P-CPQ and a sample of mothers was selected from this group for the focus group interview [Figure 1]. The parents were part of a community center catering to the needs of refugees intending to return to Syria at the end of the conflict located at Kirikhan, Turkey, 20 km from the Syrian border. The interviews were conducted in the community room of the office of the charitable organization; a place that was familiar to the mothers and was intended to put them at ease.
Figure 1: Study design

Click here to view


Analysis of data

The demographic and quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS Statistical Software version 21 (IBM-SPSS, IBM corp., Chicago IL, USA). Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the P-CPQ-8 scores between fathers and mothers across domains.

The final report of the English transcripts was analyzed using the NVivo plus version 11 (QSR Corp., Melbourne, Australia) software (SCP) and coded manually (AR) and the resultant nodes and themes were examined, and themes common to both were synthesized into a thematic analysis.


   Results Top


Of the fifty sets (n = 100) of parents contacted only thirty (n = 60) agreed to participate in the study. Of these, only 21 (n = 42) completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the sample participants was 38.2 years (±8.1 years). The fathers (39.1 ± 7.2 years) were older than the mothers (35.2 ± 9.1 years), but the difference in age was not statistically significant. The demographic profile of the sample showed that all the respondents had completed high school education at least with over half of the fathers (n = 14) and many of the mothers (n = 9) holding some form of college degree.

Quantitative analysis

The overall P-CPQ-8 scores ranged between 8 and 31, with the mothers scoring higher than the fathers in all the domains [Table 3]. The differences between parents, however, were not statistically significant. The OS domain had the highest mean score (4.56 ± 2.2) with high scores being reported by both fathers and the mothers [Table 3]. A look at the responses of the parents showed that, within this domain, pain in the teeth was of the greatest concern with only 38% of the parents reporting that their child had never experienced pain [Table 1]. Both fathers and mothers scored the FLs component of the P-CPQ the lowest [Table 3]. Over 60% of the parents reported never having witnessed FLs of oral health in their children [Table 1].
Table 3: Differences in Parental Caregivers Perceptions Questionnaires scores between fathers and mothers


Click here to view


Qualitative analysis

When the English translation of the transcripts was entered into the NVivo software to discover underlying themes, analysis of the transcripts revealed three basic underlying themes.

  1. Access to the dental clinic
  2. Pain felt by the child
  3. Oral hygiene of the child.


Access to dental care

The cost of transportation figured prominently in most mothers' concerns for oral health care. However, more prominent was the fear of taking off work for the care of their children. Many of the mothers were reminiscent of their time in Syria when they had regular jobs and could take time off work to bring their children to work. As one mother put it:

“I get really upset for my children, most of my children have dental problems but I don't always have the ability to take them to the dentist even if the treatment is for free.”

Pain felt by the child

The mothers almost universally agreed that pain felt by the child was the greatest problem faced by the child. The pain felt by the child manifested in many mothers as being personal as stated by some mothers:

“When they are in pain it's like we're in pain because they are just kids and they don't understand.”

The mothers associated pain in the tooth with terms such as “disturbed” and “angry.” Most of the mothers felt that pain in the teeth affected their children psychologically. As one mother put it, “pain changes her psyche, it makes her angry.” The parents also stated that dental pain only highlighted the limitations of what they were able to provide for their children. More than one mother reported that the pain in the teeth was a constant reminder of their inability to provide care for their children and served as a trigger for deeper feelings of anger and frustration.

Oral hygiene of the child

The oral hygiene (including means of maintaining oral hygiene) was an important concern for the mothers. When asked about dental care, most of the mothers immediately associated it with oral hygiene. The mothers' responses reported the effects of displacement on the priorities given to oral hygiene. Inability to replace toothbrushes was a common theme with several mothers stating that they were using old worn out brushes. This problem was appreciated, especially in the words of one of the mothers who said:

“They used to brush their teeth 2 times per day but now when we came to Turkey they don't brush their teeth so now they only clean them with soap and water.”

Gargling with salt water and washing the mouth with soap water were two methods that many of the mothers reported as their means of maintaining oral hygiene. The inability to buy oral hygiene products was best summarized by one of the mothers who said, “We can't afford to buy toothpaste, we receive soap as part of care packages.”


   Discussion Top


Early childhood oral health is an issue that has received a great deal of attention in the literature over the past few years with an evidence suggesting that oral health could impact general health of children.[16] The vulnerable nature of refugee populations makes it important to appreciate the impact that oral health could have on the quality of life of these children.[17] The primary aim of this study was to assess the OHRQoL of Syrian refugee children living in Turkey. Unlike previous studies that have been conducted in resettled populations, this study chose to focus on a group that intended to return to their homeland.[18],[19],[20]

The short-form P-CPQ-8 has been validated in Arabic and previously used to assess OHRQoL.[12] However, while such a quantitative approach could assess overall patterns of oral health problems, it is not a proficient means of obtaining in-depth information and perspective. The use of qualitative interviewing has been proposed as a means of getting in-depth information from a relatively small sample.[21],[22] Previous studies in Arab populations have shown that mothers are traditionally better early childhood oral health proxies than fathers.[23] It was for this reason that the interviews focused solely on the mothers.

While studies on resettled populations have focused on communities continuing traditional oral health practices, and the difficulties they faced in integrating into their new homeland, our interviews highlighted the trouble parents were having to face with shortages of materials. The decision of parents to use soap and water to clean the teeth, for example, was a practice brought about by necessity and not habit. Maternal concerns about oral hygiene figured prominently in the interviews with mothers stating that they were trying their best to provide care to their children in the circumstances.

It was evident from both the P-CPQ-8 questionnaire and the focus group interview that the pain of their children was of the greatest concern to the parents. The association of words such as “anger,” “frustration,” and “change in psyche” with the term dental pain in the interviews suggested that dental pain may well serve as a trigger for more serious psychological issues. While the psychological problems faced by resettled refugees and their impact on oral health has been previously addressed,[20],[24],[25] the impact on displaced populations merits further research.

The sense of frustration in the interviewed population was perhaps accentuated by the fact that most of the mothers came from families where at least one, if not both parents were well educated and were used to providing care for their children. Fear of being unable to take care of children has been previously reported in patients fleeing conflict zones although these have often been documented in greater detail in resettled populations with a fear of being denied existing health-care benefits in the host country.[25],[26]

The results of this study must be viewed in light of certain limitations. The small sample size and lack of multiple groups were due to the difficulties in returning to the region. Despite this, the study offers an insight into the oral health concerns of a temporarily displaced population that hopes to return to Syria.


   Conclusion Top


Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that children who are refugees from the crisis in Syria face significant oral health challenges that adversely affect their OHRQoL. The parents interviewed in this study were aware of the importance of oral hygiene but emphasized their inability to look after their children's teeth. Further research into the effect of oral health on the overall physical health and psychological well-being of these children is necessary.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge with gratitude the support provided by the volunteers of the HAYAT foundation Kirikhan, Antakya, Turkey, for all their assistance during the conduct of this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Akbarzada S, Mackey TK. The Syrian public health and humanitarian crisis: A 'displacement' in global governance? Glob Public Health 2017;1-17 [E-pub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Syria Regional Refugee Response. Available from: http://www.data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/country.php?id=224 [Last accessed on 2017 May].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Müller MF, Yoon J, Gorelick SM, Avisse N, Tilmant A. Impact of the Syrian refugee crisis on land use and transboundary freshwater resources. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113:14932-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ay M, Arcos González P, Castro Delgado R. The perceived barriers of access to health care among a group of non-camp Syrian refugees in Jordan. Int J Health Serv 2016;46:566-89.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Turkey Syrian Refugee Daily Sitrep Available from: http://www.D:/new%20downloads/UNHCRTurkeySyriaSitrep13June2014.pdf [Last accessed on 2017 May].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
van Berlaer G, Bohle Carbonell F, Manantsoa S, de Béthune X, Buyl R, Debacker M, et al. Arefugee camp in the centre of Europe: Clinical characteristics of asylum seekers arriving in Brussels. BMJ Open 2016;6:e013963.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Keboa MT, Hiles N, Macdonald ME. The oral health of refugees and asylum seekers: A scoping review. Global Health 2016;12:59.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Doocy S, Lyles E, Roberton T, Akhu-Zaheya L, Oweis A, Burnham G. Prevalence and care-seeking for chronic diseases among Syrian refugees in Jordan. BMC Public Health 2015;15:1097.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kumar S, Kroon J, Lalloo R, Kulkarni S, Johnson NW. Relationship between body mass index and dental caries in children, and the influence of socio-economic status. Int Dent J 2017;67:91-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Riggs E, Rajan S, Casey S, Kilpatrick N. Refugee child oral health. Oral Dis 2017;23:292-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Riggs E, Rajan S, Casey S, Kilpatrick N. Refugee child oral health. Oral Dis 2017;23:292-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Al-Riyami IA, Thomson WM, Al-Harthi LS. Testing the Arabic short form versions of the Parental-Caregivers Perceptions Questionnaire and the Family Impact Scale in Oman. Saudi Dent J 2016;28:31-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Wong D, Perez-Spiess S, Julliard K. Attitudes of Chinese parents toward the oral health of their children with caries: A qualitative study. Pediatr Dent 2005;27:505-12.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kousoulis AA, Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Economopoulos KP. Access to health for refugees in Greece: Lessons in inequalities. Int J Equity Health 2016;15:122.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Halcomb EJ, Gholizadeh L, DiGiacomo M, Phillips J, Davidson PM. Literature review: Considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. J Clin Nurs 2007;16:1000-11.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bernstein J, Gebel C, Vargas C, Geltman P, Walter A, Garcia RI, et al. Integration of oral health into the well-child visit at federally qualified health centers: Study of 6 clinics, August 2014-March 2015. Prev Chronic Dis 2016;13:E58.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Davidson N, Skull S, Calache H, Chesters D, Chalmers J. Equitable access to dental care for an at-risk group: A review of services for Australian refugees. Aust N Z J Public Health 2007;31:73-80.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Gibbs L, Waters E, de Silva A, Riggs E, Moore L, Armit C, et al. An exploratory trial implementing a community-based child oral health promotion intervention for Australian families from refugee and migrant backgrounds: A protocol paper for Teeth Tales. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004260.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Nicol P, Al-Hanbali A, King N, Slack-Smith L, Cherian S. Informing a culturally appropriate approach to oral health and dental care for pre-school refugee children: A community participatory study. BMC Oral Health 2014;14:69.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Riggs E, Gibbs L, Kilpatrick N, Gussy M, van Gemert C, Ali S, et al. Breaking down the barriers: A qualitative study to understand child oral health in refugee and migrant communities in Australia. Ethn Health 2015;20:241-57.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995;311:299-302.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Sim J. Collecting and analysing qualitative data: Issues raised by the focus group. J Adv Nurs 1998;28:345-52.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Pani SC, Badea L, Mirza S, Elbaage N. Differences in perceptions of early childhood oral health-related quality of life between fathers and mothers in Saudi Arabia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2012;22:244-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Lamb CE, Whelan AK, Michaels C. Refugees and oral health: Lessons learned from stories of Hazara refugees. Aust Health Rev 2009;33:618-27.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Wahoush EO. Equitable health-care access: The experiences of refugee and refugee claimant mothers with an ill preschooler. Can J Nurs Res 2009;41:186-206.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Dumbrill GC Your policies, our children: Messages from refugee parents to child welfare workers and policymakers. Child Welfare 2009;88:145-68.  Back to cited text no. 26
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (541 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1166    
    Printed13    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded158    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal