Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions| Reviewers

Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 775    
     


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 12-20
Immunohistochemical analysis of the role connective tissue growth factor in drug-induced gingival overgrowth in response to phenytoin, cyclosporine, and nifedipine


1 Department of Periodontics, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Periodontics, Ragas Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India
4 Department of Oral Medicine S.C.B. Dental College and Hospitals, Cuttack, Odisha, India

Date of Submission12-Nov-2017
Date of Acceptance25-Dec-2017
Date of Web Publication06-Feb-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Debasish Mishra
Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Campus 5, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_403_17

Rights and Permissions

   Abstract 

Objective: To evaluate for the presence of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) in drug (phenytoin, cyclosporine, and nifedipine)-induced gingival overgrowth (DIGO) and to compare it with healthy controls in the absence of overgrowth.
Materials and Methods: Thirty-five patients were chosen for the study and segregated into study (25) and control groups (10). The study group consisted of phenytoin-induced (10), cyclosporine-induced (10), and nifedipine-induced (5) gingival overgrowth. After completing necessary medical evaluations, biopsy was done. The tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin and then immunohistochemically evaluated for the presence of CTGF. The statistical analysis of the values was done using statistical package SPSS PC+ (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 4.01).
Results: The outcome of immunohistochemistry shows that DIGO samples express more CTGF than control group and phenytoin expresses more CTGF followed by nifedipine and cyclosporine.
Conclusion: The study shows that there is an increase in the levels of CTGF in patients with DIGO in comparison to the control group without any gingival overgrowth. In the study, we compared the levels of CTGF in DIGO induced by three most commonly used drugs phenytoin, cyclosporine, and nifedipine. By comparing the levels of CTGF, we find that cyclosporine induces the production of least amount of CTGF. Therefore, it might be a more viable drug choice with reduced side effects.


Keywords: Connective tissue growth factor, cyclosporine, drug-induced gingival overgrowth, nifedipine, phenytoin


How to cite this article:
Anand A J, Gopalakrishnan S, Karthikeyan R, Mishra D, Mohapatra S. Immunohistochemical analysis of the role connective tissue growth factor in drug-induced gingival overgrowth in response to phenytoin, cyclosporine, and nifedipine. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2018;8:12-20

How to cite this URL:
Anand A J, Gopalakrishnan S, Karthikeyan R, Mishra D, Mohapatra S. Immunohistochemical analysis of the role connective tissue growth factor in drug-induced gingival overgrowth in response to phenytoin, cyclosporine, and nifedipine. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Jun 19];8:12-20. Available from: http://www.jispcd.org/text.asp?2018/8/1/12/224871



   Introduction Top


Drug therapy for the treatment of any disease results in side effects based on the environment and host factors. One such side effect is gingival overgrowth, which is often seen in patients taking drugs such as phenytoin, cyclosporine, and nifedipine.

This abnormal growth creates considerable discomfort for a patient with increasing accumulation of debris in the oral cavity. It leads to halitosis and advanced periodontal damages.

Previous literature shows that increased levels of various cytokines as transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), fibroblast growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) are elevated in drug-induced gingival overgrowth (DIGO). These cytokines play an active role in the development of DIGO.[1],[2],[3],[4]

CTGF belongs to a recently discovered group of cytokines known as Cyr61 Ctgf Nov family of factors that are required for the biologic process of repair and differentiation.[4],[5] CTGF was found to stimulate fibroblast and play a pivotal role in the growth of extracellular matrix synthesis.[6]

Extensive literature is explaining the pathogenesis of DIGO. However, there are yet insufficient numbers of research statistically analyzing the role of CTGF in DIGO.[7]

Therefore, the present comparative study has been undertaken to quantifiably assess the involvement of CTGF in DIGO with the help of immunohistochemistry. By this, the role of CTGF in DIGO will be clearer.


   Materials and Methods Top


Patients attending the Department of Neurology, Cardiology, and Transplant Medicine, Madras Medical College and Government General Hospital, Chennai-3, undergoing medication with phenytoin, cyclosporine, and nifedipine were screened for gingival overgrowth and referred to the Department of Periodontics, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College, Chennai, for this study. The Institutional Review Board of Madras Dental College approved the study protocol via approval letter numbered DE/102/2004. Before conducting the study, the procedure was explained to all patients, and informed consent was obtained from each of the patients. The study was conducted for 6 months.

To select patients for the study, strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were followed. After consultation with a statistician, a sample size of minimum 30 patients was finalized to have statistically relevant data.

Therefore, based on above-mentioned factors, 35 patients were selected for the study and then separated into two groups: control and study groups.

The control group (10 patients) consisted of systemically healthy patients with clinical normal gingiva without any overgrowth.

The study group consists of Groups A, B, and C as follows:

  • Group A: Phenytoin-induced gingival overgrowth (10 patients)
  • Group B: Cyclosporine-induced gingival overgrowth (10 patients)
  • Group C: Nifedipine-induced gingival overgrowth (5 patients).


Inclusion criteria for control group

  1. The gingival tissue samples were obtained from systemically healthy patients who were treated for preprosthetic crown lengthening
  2. Patients received no drug known to cause gingival overgrowth
  3. Gingival overgrowth index (GOI) (Seymour) of zero.


Exclusion criteria for control group

  1. Pregnant women
  2. Smokers
  3. Patients with a history of systemic disease
  4. Patients under any medication known to cause gingival overgrowth.


Inclusion criteria for study group

  1. Patients taking the drug (phenytoin, cyclosporine, and nifedipine) for a minimum period of 1 year and developed gingival overgrowth [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
  2. GOI (Seymour) of two or three.
Figure 1: Clinical case (Study Group A). Phenytoin-induced gingival overgrowth

Click here to view
Figure 2: Clinical case (Study Group B). Cyclosporine-induced gingival overgrowth

Click here to view
Figure 3: Clinical case (Study Group C). Nifedipine-induced gingival overgrowth

Click here to view


Exclusion criteria for study group

  1. Pregnant women
  2. Gingival overgrowth caused by factors other than drug intake
  3. Patients who were orthodontically treated.


Study protocol

  1. History, screening, consent
  2. Clinical examination
  3. Investigation
  4. Fitness from a physician
  5. Scaling
  6. Biopsy
  7. Immunohistochemistry
  8. Statistics.


Initial assessment of the selected patients was carried out by history taking. Clinical examination and assessment of gingival overgrowth were done in all patients using the index of Seymour.

GOI of 0 was taken for control and score 2 or 3 was taken for study groups done in the previous studies.

Biopsy procedure

All the patients were made to undergo routine hematological and biochemical investigations. Before biopsy, fitness assessment and oral prophylaxis were also carried out for every patient.

After anesthetizing the sample site using 2% lignocaine hydrochloride, gingival biopsies were obtained using a Bard-Parker blade No 11 or 15. The gingival biopsy tissue samples comprised the interdental papilla, gingival margin, and attached gingiva [Figure 4]. Adequate care was taken not to damage the gingival tissue during biopsy. Immediately after excision, the gingival tissue samples were collected in sterile bottle with 10% formalin and labeled [Figure 5].
Figure 4: Biopsy procedure

Click here to view
Figure 5: Gingival tissue sample transferred into 10% formalin

Click here to view


Slide preparation

The tissue samples, which were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, were embedded in paraffin and mounted on wax blocks before slide preparation.

The glass slides were precoated with 1% poly-L-lysine in aqueous water solution and then air-dry. With the help of a microtome, tissue sections of 4 μ were sectioned from the paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissue blocks. Numbering was done for all the slides for the control and study groups to prevent any bias. Two slides were made from tissue specimen; one slide for hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) staining and one slide for immunohistochemistry.

Antibodies used for immunohistochemistry

  1. Primary antibody – CTGF antibody, from Gene Tex, USA; rabbit polyclonal to human CTGF; dilution – 1:400
  2. Secondary antibody – Histostain-Plus kits; labeled streptavidin-biotin (LAB-SA) Detection System; from Zymed Laboratories; chromogen used – 3,3'-diaminobenzidine.


Hematoxylin and eosin staining procedures

  1. Dewax sections, hydrate through graded alcohols to water
  2. Stain in hematoxylin for 5–10 min
  3. Wash well in running tap water for 5 min
  4. Differentiate in 1% acid alcohol for 5–10 s
  5. Wash wells in tap water for 5 min
  6. Stain in 1% eosin Y for 10 min
  7. Wash in running tap water for 1–5 min
  8. Dehydrate through alcohols; clear and mount.


H and E staining are carried out to investigate gingival hyperplasia and fibrosis under microscope.

The data collected by immunohistochemistry were analyzed statistically using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney test.

Statistics analysis

The statistical package SPSS PC+ (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 4.01, by IBM) was used for statistical analysis. The mean values and test of significance were obtained using the Kruskal–Wallis (H-test) and Mann–Whitney test. The Kruskal–Wallis test is used to compare one group with several groups using the formula:



Where H is statistical significance, Rj is the sum of ranks of the sample, Nj is the size of sample j, N is the size of the pooled sample.

Mann–Whitney test is used to compare the observations of two samples. Let n1 is the size of first sample, n2 the size of second sample, N = n1 + n2. Let R1 be the sum of ranks of observations of the first sample and R2 be the sum of the ranks of observations of the second sample. The mean is calculated using the formula:





Where μU is mean and σ2U is variance.

In the present study, P < 0.05 was considered as the level of significance.


   Results Top


Thirty-five patients selected for the study were divided into control (10) and study group (25). The study group was further divided into 10 patients in Group A (phenytoin), 10 patients in Group B (cyclosporine), and 5 patients in Group C (nifedipine).

H and E-stained sections were made from all study samples and reveal gingival hyperplasia with dense, elongated, and thin rete pegs inserted in deep connective tissue. The fibrosis and CTGF-positive staining were more in study group than in control group. The phenytoin group (10 patients) was found to be more hyperplastic and fibrotic and also more positive for CTGF when compared with nifedipine (5 patients) and cyclosporine (10 patients).

Two qualified pathologists analyzed the results of immunohistochemistry, and all the slides were numbered to prevent any bias in the process.

[Table 1] shows the immunohistochemical staining characteristic in control where few cases have taken negative and few positive staining, and none of them had taken strongly positive staining. [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4] show staining characteristic of phenytoin-, cyclosporine-, and nifedipine-induced gingival overgrowth taking positive and strongly positive staining, and very few cases had taken negative staining.
Table 1: Staining characteristic for control group

Click here to view
Table 2: Staining characteristic for study Group A (phenytoin)

Click here to view
Table 3: Staining characteristic for study Group B (cyclosporine)

Click here to view
Table 4: Staining characteristic for study Group C (nifedipine)

Click here to view


[Table 5] depicts the mean values in control and study groups, by applying Kruskal–Wallis test and the P values indicating the statistical significance in study group when compared to control group.
Table 5: The mean value in control and study groups and their test of significance using Kruskal-Wallis test

Click here to view


[Graph 1] shows the graphical expression of the data, wherein the study group (phenytoin, nifedipine, and cyclosporine) shows more CTGF expression in comparison to control group.



[Table 6] [Graph 2] shows the outcome of Mann–Whitney test to compare the control and study Group A (phenytoin). A value of P < 0.05 indicates that there is a statistical significance which is maximum in connective tissue, followed by epithelium and the blood vessel.
Table 6: The mean and P value of Mann-Whitney test of control and study Group A (phenytoin)

Click here to view



Similar to the previous, [Table 7] [Graph 3] and [Table 8] [Graph 4] show the results of Mann–Whitney test made to compare control with study Group B (cyclosporine) and study Group C (nifedipine) respectively. The P values show that there is maximum significance of CTGF staining in phenytoin, followed by nifedipine and cyclosporine.
Table 7: Mean and P value of Mann-Whitney test of control and study Group B (cyclosporine)

Click here to view
Table 8: Mean and P value of Mann-Whitney test of control and study Group C (nifedipine)

Click here to view




   Discussion Top


The clinical appearance of gingival overgrowth is a common and well-documented side effect, following the prescribed use of calcium channel blockers, anticonvulsants, and immunosuppressant used, respectively, to manage hypertension, epilepsy, and organ transplant situations.

The fact that these drugs are extensively prescribed by doctors to manage common conditions such as hypertension and epilepsy makes the understanding of the role of CTGF in gingival overgrowth very important as a precise mode to manage the condition.

In this study, our goal was to establish a relation between the use of these commonly prescribed drugs (phenytoin, cyclosporine, and nifedipine) and the increase in the concentration of CTGF in response to their usage, which can lead to a better clinical application of the drugs and also the necessary drug changes.

Several analyses [4],[8] have indicated that, of the twenty drugs known to cause DIGO, phenytoin, cyclosporine, and nifedipine account for 90% of the gingival overgrowth associated to drug therapy. The pathogenic mechanism that induces DIGO has been studied by numerous authors.[9],[10],[11],[12] It has resulted in a better understanding on the development of DIGO and its subsequent management.

Many authors [13],[14] have documented alteration in the cytokines such as interleukin 2 (IL2), IL6, PDGF, TGFβ, and CTGF in DIGO.

In concurrence with the current study, Uzel [4]et al stated about the elevated level of CTGF in DIGO in various fibrotic disorders. However, as the number of analysis to statistically document the role of CTGF in DIGO [1],[3] has been limited, we undertook the present study to further strengthen the data on the role of CTGF in the expression of drug-induced gingival enlargement.

Similar to the previous studies,[1],[3] the gingival samples for control group were taken from healthy patients who were treated for preprosthetic crown lengthening.

In the present study, GOI of Seymour [15] was used as it has been found to be more accurate and sensitive to assess DIGO.

Of the various immunohistochemical methods, study with the second-generation LAB-SA is found to be more sensitive and has the least cross-reactivity and is more reliable. Hence, LAB-SA method has been used in the present study. Previous research [3] on the role of CTGF has used the first generation avidin-biotin method (ABC method).

Similar to the previous literature,[1],[3] all tissues were stained with H and E. The sections reveal gingival hyperplasia with dense, elongated, and thin rete pegs inserted in deep connective tissue, which were more in phenytoin group followed by nifedipine and cyclosporine group. All control slides reveal histologically healthy gingiva in the absence of hyperplasia and fibrosis [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14], [Figure 15].
Figure 6: Control group taking negative staining for connective tissue growth factor

Click here to view
Figure 7: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of control group

Click here to view
Figure 8: Study Group A (phenytoin) taking up positive staining for connective tissue growth factor (magnification X)

Click here to view
Figure 9: Study Group A (phenytoin) taking up positive staining for connective tissue growth factor (magnification 3X)

Click here to view
Figure 10: Study Group B (cyclosporine) taking positive staining for connective tissue growth factor (magnification X)

Click here to view
Figure 11: Study Group B (cyclosporine) taking positive staining for connective tissue growth factor (magnification 3X)

Click here to view
Figure 12: Study Group C (nifedipine) taking positive staining for connective tissue growth factor (magnification X)

Click here to view
Figure 13: Study Group C (nifedipine) taking positive staining for connective tissue growth factor (magnification 3X)

Click here to view
Figure 14: Blood vessel taking positive staining for connective tissue growth factor

Click here to view
Figure 15: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of phenytoin-induced gingival overgrowth

Click here to view


In the current study, the histochemical evaluation showed that CTGF staining using CTGF polyclonal antibody was more in the case of the study group compared to the control group. The study group showed a statistical significance (P < 0.05) in agreement with the previous study by Uzel et al.[3]

In the present study, statistical analysis was done using Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test as done in previous research.[3]

The intensity of CTGF staining was maximum in phenytoin followed by nifedipine and cyclosporine similar to the study by Uzel. In their study,[3] they have stated that cyclosporine-induced gingival overgrowth is more inflamed and less fibrotic; hence, it has minimal CTGF staining.

Since DIGO is attributed to alterations in profibrotic cytokines such as TGFβ, insulin growth factor I, CTGF, as well as other pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL1 and IL6,[16],[19] further multifactorial studies have to be done with more sample size so as to get an assertive knowledge about the role played by proinflammatory and profibrotic cytokines and the extent of DIGO.


   Conclusion Top


The expression of CTGF in the DIGO was maximum in phenytoin followed by nifedipine and cyclosporine.

The current study helps in shedding some light on the threshold of the drug quantity that can result in clinical manifestation of DIGO. This knowledge is necessary as expression of DIGO many times depend on the susceptibility of the host to a particular drug and also the quantity of the drug being administered.

In the course of this study, with the help of immunohistochemical methods, we found that in the clinical cases of DIGO (study group), the concentration of CTGF was maximum in the case of patients using phenytoin followed by those using nifedipine and cyclosporine.

Though more elaborate and larger scale research can be carried out, the result of this study provides a clinical idea regarding which drug usage results in more CTGF production, thereby enabling the clinician to make more effective drug choice or changes.

Increasing the sample size and analyzing the response of growth factors to different drug combinations, in this regard, can further enhance our understanding on the management of DIGO. As stated previously, future research can be made more multifactorial in nature to provide a much wider and inclusive data on the clinical manifestation as well as management of DIGO.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Hong HH, Uzel MI, Duan C, Sheff MC, Trackman PC. Regulation of Iysyl oxidase, collagen, and connective tissue growth factor by TGF-beta and detection in human gingiva. Cytokines 1999;79:1655-67.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Bharti V, Bansal C. Drug-induced gingival overgrowth: The nemesis of gingiva unravelled. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17:182-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
3.
Ramírez-Rámiz A, Brunet-LLobet L, Lahor-Soler E, Miranda-Rius J. On the cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug-induced gingival overgrowth. Open Dent J 2017;11:420-35.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Uzel MI, Kantarci A, Hong HH, Uygur C, Sheff MC, Firatli E, et al. Connective tissue growth factor in drug-induced gingival overgrowth. J Periodontol 2001;72:921-31.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hatahira H, Abe J, Hane Y, Matsui T, Sasaoka S, Motooka Y, et al. Drug-induced gingival hyperplasia: A retrospective study using spontaneous reporting system databases. J Pharm Health Care Sci 2017;3:19.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bradham DM, Igarashi A, Potter RL, Grotendorst GR. Connective tissue growth factor: A cysteine-rich mitogen secreted by human vascular endothelial cells is related to the SRC-induced immediate early gene product CEF-10. J Cell Biol 1991;114:1285-94.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Brigstock DR. The connective tissue growth factor/cysteine-rich 61/nephroblastoma overexpressed (CCN) family. Endocr Rev 1999;20:189-206.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Hunasgi S, Koneru A, Vanishree M, Manvikar V. Assessment of reactive gingival lesions of oral cavity: A histopathological study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2017;21:180.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Ponnaiyan D, Jegadeesan V. Cyclosporine A: Novel concepts in its role in drug-induced gingival overgrowth. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015;12:499-506.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Sunil PM, Nalluswami JS, Sanghar SJ, Joseph I. Nifedipine-induced gingival enlargement: Correlation with dose and oral hygiene. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012;4:S191-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Sharma PK, Misra AK, Chugh A, Chugh VK, Gonnade N, Singh S, et al. Gingival hyperplasia: Should drug interaction be blamed for? Indian J Pharmacol 2017;49:257-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
12.
Ranga Rao S, Subbarayan R, Ajitkumar S, Murugan Girija D. Increased advanced oxidation protein products generation by cyclosporine-A and angiotensin II in human gingival fibroblasts – Ex-vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:ZC49-52.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Seymour RA, Jacobs DJ. Cyclosporine and the gingival tissue. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Trackman PC, Kantarci A. Connective tissue metabolism and gingival overgrowth. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004;15:165-75.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Firs Kop T. Drug induced gingival overgrowth – Review. BDJ 1987;184:305-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Iacopino AM, Doxey D, Cutler CW, Nares S, Stoever K, Fojt J, et al. Phenytoin and cyclosporine A specifically regulate macrophage phenotype and expression of platelet-derived growth factor and interleukin-1 in vitro and in vivo: Possible molecular mechanism of drug-induced gingival hyperplasia. J Periodontol 1997;68:73-83.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Modéer T, Domeij H, Andurén I, Mustafa M, Brunius G. Effect of phenytoin on the production of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in human gingival fibroblasts. J Oral Pathol Med 2000;29:491-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Seymour RA, Ellis JS, Thomason JM. Risk factors for drug-induced gingival overgrowth. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:217-23.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Suneja B, Chopra S, Thomas AM, Pandian J. A clinical evaluation of gingival overgrowth in children on antiepileptic drug therapy. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:ZC32-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14], [Figure 15]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (3,996 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
     Introduction
   Materials and Me...
     Results
     Discussion
     Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed376    
    Printed21    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded72    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal