Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions| Reviewers

Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 10    
     


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 333-338
Evaluation of temporomandibular disorders and comorbidities in patients with Ehler-–Danlos: Clinical and digital findings


1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
2 Department of Rare Diseases, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Date of Submission05-Mar-2018
Date of Acceptance02-May-2018
Date of Web Publication18-Jul-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Paola Di Giacomo
Via Caserta 6, 00135 Roma
Italy
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_103_18

Rights and Permissions

   Abstract 

Objective: The objective of this study is to recognize representative cranio-cervico-mandibular features of patients with Ehler–Danlos syndrome and associated temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), to assess a targeted and integrated treatment plan.
Materials and Methods: After a diagnosis of disease, 38 individiuals with Ehler–Danlos syndrome and temporomandibular symptomatology referred were evaluated. Gnathological evaluation, according to the Diagnostic Criteria for TMDs, and radiographic imaging was performed. In addition, digital evaluation of occlusal and muscular balance, using surface electromyography of jaw muscles, was conducted. Statistical software for data analysis - STATA (StataCorp, College station, Texas, USA) - was used.
Results: Most common temporomandibular dysfunctions were arthralgia, myalgia, disc displacement with reduction and subluxation. Headache and neck pain were the most frequent comorbidities. Somatization, depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive behavior were the most recurrent psychological disorders. Electromyographic analysis showed out of normal range data.
Conclusion: Early diagnosis and interception are requested to avoid injuries and repeated traumatism. Multidisciplinary treatments are available to approach all the aspects of the syndrome.


Keywords: Ehler–Danlos syndrome, electromyography, headache, neck pain temporomandibular disorders


How to cite this article:
Di Giacomo P, Celli M, Ierardo G, Polimeni A, Di Paolo C. Evaluation of temporomandibular disorders and comorbidities in patients with Ehler-–Danlos: Clinical and digital findings. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2018;8:333-8

How to cite this URL:
Di Giacomo P, Celli M, Ierardo G, Polimeni A, Di Paolo C. Evaluation of temporomandibular disorders and comorbidities in patients with Ehler-–Danlos: Clinical and digital findings. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 7];8:333-8. Available from: http://www.jispcd.org/text.asp?2018/8/4/333/237060



   Introduction Top


Oral and mandibular manifestations have been noticed in all types of Ehler–Danlos Syndromes. Collagen alterations compromise oral health affecting not only vascular system, bone, teeth, periodontium but also the neuromuscular and articular system.[1],[2] These manifestations are often unknown and ignored by clinicians but are commonly reported by patients, with a substantial impact on the quality of life.[3]

Ehler–Danlos syndromes and temporomandibular disorders (TMD) have been linked in several studies.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] In this kind of patients, temporomandibular joints (TMJ) are often hypermobile, subluxe and can dislocate.[1],[12],[13] TMJ dislocation is noted to occur more often in women than in the general population.[14] Recurrent subluxations and luxation of the TMJ could lead to the cartilaginous disc displacement resulting in pain, bone destruction, and in some severe cases, limited mobility. Jaw muscles can be overload and stressed, causing referred face, head and neck pain thus resulting in decreased functionality and quality of life.[15],[16] Temporomandibular comorbidities such as cervical spine instability and headache are recognizable in patients with Ehler–Danlos syndrome.[17]

Psychological problems, such as depression and anxiety, are common and also caused by a deterioration of the quality of life for ineffective treatments. Sleep disorders are also associated.[18]

Diagnostic guidelines are necessary for correct evaluation and treatment of patients with Ehler–Danlos and associated TMDs.


   Materials and Methods Top


The study was approved by the Institutional Human Ethics Committee, Sapienza University of Rome, protocol no. 0001385.

Study design

In the first instance, individuals with Ehler–Danlos syndrome had to be recruited at the Department of Rare Diseases of Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome. In the second phase, patients had to be sent to the Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Sciences of Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, for the evaluation of the presence of TMDs.

Forty-five patients with Ehler–Danlos syndrome were visited between January 2017 and February 2018. Six patients did not report temporomandibular dysfunctions. Thirty-eight patients with cranio-cervico-mandibular symptomatology (30 females and eight males) with an average age of 34 years were selected. Whereas Ehler–Danlos syndromes are a group of rare diseases, the sample size was considered sufficiently representative.

Subjects eligible for the study had provided signed informed consent, according to the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki.

Gnathological evaluation

The presence of TMDs was assessed, according to Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular joint disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I.[19] DC/TMD includes pain disorders and joint Disorders. Twelve types of temporomandibular dysfunctions are mentioned: Arthralgia, myalgia, local myalgia, myofascial pain, myofascial pain with referral, four type of disc displacement disorders, degenerative joint disease, subluxation, and headache attributed to TMD.

The type of pain was evaluated, recording anatomical position, and intensity.

Pain intensity (cephalic, joint, muscle, and cervical pain) was quantified using the verbal numeric scale (VNS),[20] which has numeric values (0–100) to indicate pain intensity, with the division into five groups: 0 (no pain); 0–20 (slight and episodic pain); 20–50 (moderate pain); 50–80 (severe pain); and 80–100 (very severe pain).

Psychological problems and emotional strain were assessed with Symptom Check List revised 90. It is a brief self-report psychometric instrument (questionnaire) published by the Clinical Assessment division of the Pearson Assessment and Information group. It evaluates a wide range of psychological problems and symptoms. The SCL-90-R is normed on individuals 13 years and older. It consists of 90 items and takes 12–15 min to administer. The primary symptoms that are assessed are somatization, obsessive-compulsive behavior, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoia, and psychoticism. It is one of the most widely used measures of psychological distress in clinical practice and research.

Digital evaluation with surface electromyography

BTS JOINT device is a wireless surface Electromyography of masticatory muscles which analyzes the occlusal-muscular balance. Electromyography of the masseter muscles and the anterior bundle of the temporalis muscles was applied. The following indexes were considered:

POC (Percent Overlapping Coefficient) = index of standardized contraction symmetry within the same muscular couple (TA – temporalis anterior bundle; MM – masseter) (normal range % 83–100)

IMP = fatigue and parafunction index (normal range % 85–100)

ASIM = asymmetry index. Evaluation of balanced muscular activation between both sides (normal range % −10 and +10)

TORS = activation of couple of muscles who induces a mandibular rotation on the transversal plane (normal range % 90–100)

BAR = occlusal-muscular center of gravity (normal range % 90–100)

The same operator, previously calibrated, carried out all the clinical and instrumental evaluations. Another operator controlled all the data to verify their reliability.

All data were analyzed using descriptive percentages, average, and standard deviation systems. Results are shown in tabular and graphical forms.


   Results Top


Given the great amount of data emerging from research, the results were divided into three sections: (a) results emerged from the gnathological evaluations (b) results emerged from the psychological evaluation, and (c) results emerged from the surface electromyography.

Gnathological evaluation results

Joint and pain disorders, according to DC/temporomandibular disorders

Most common joint disorders in patients with Ehler–Danlos syndrome are mono or bilateral disc displacements and mono or bilateral subluxation, as shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Gnathological analysis according to diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. Percentage values of prevalence and absolute frequency (n) of each joint disorder

Click here to view


Patients referred pain in correspondence of TMJs and masticatory muscles with high frequency and severe intensity, according to VNS, as shown in [Table 2].
Table 2: Gnathological analysis, according to diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. Percentage values of prevalence and absolute frequency (n) of each pain disorder

Click here to view


Headache

In our sample, 80% (30 patients) referred a moderate mono or bilateral pain in temporal region. VNS value was 7.59 ± 1.26. The type of pain was throbbing and dull with chronic frequency, also associated to episodes of migraine with aura and factors such as inclination head changes. Other frequent sites are the frontal and orbital portion of the skull and the occiput.

The comorbidity associated in all patients was cervical pain with high intensity.

Psychological evaluation

The SCL-90 reported a high percentage for somatization, obsessive-compulsive behavior, depression and anxiety, as showed in [Figure 1] and [Table 3].
Figure 1: Percentage scores for each item of SCL-90

Click here to view
Table 3: Average and standard deviation for each item of symptom checklist revised 90. Psychopathological dimension: Absent ≤1; slight 1>×≥2; moderate 2>×≥3; and severe ≥3. After the calculation of the coefficient of variation (σ/μ), average values do not seem to be representative of the sample, except for some of these. Therefore, percentage values were taken into account for the conclusive considerations

Click here to view


Digital evaluation

Surface electromyography

In the sample, 95% (36 patients) had BAR (occlusal-muscular center of gravity) value x >100 and located in an anterior position. IMP (index of parafunction and muscular fatigue) value is x >100 in the 95% of patients and indicates the presence of parafunctions. Simmetry indexes were also alterated except for POC MM (index of standardized contraction symmetry within the couple of masseters) [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Results of surface electromyography. Absolute frequencies for each index

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


TMJs and related muscles are among the structures involved in patients with Ehler–Danlos syndrome. The complicated clinical picture requires a multilevel approach, to establish the most adequate treatment plan. The study was born with the necessity to define a specific diagnostic and therapeutic protocol for this type of patients. In the scientific literature, there is a representative study about definition of oral and mandibular manifestations of Ehler–Danlos syndrome,[21] to which we have done reference to define a more specific flowchart of diagnosis and therapy for each patient.

Furthermore, in addition to clinical and psychological evaluations, digital analysis of muscular balance on the basis of occlusal contacts was assessed for the first time in this kind of patients. This represents a starting point to evaluate the occlusal stability as support to articular and muscular balance and to find adequate conservative occlusal adjustments, with the help of the last generation device.

The sample group consisted of patients which had never undertaken rehabilitations and therapies and with a diagnosed TMD. Young patients were excluded for this last reason, in fact, they did not report any mandibular dysfunction. Anyway, they were included in a separate group to monitor the developments of disease to prevent and intercept any mandibular problem.

Clinical temporomandibular features

The scientific literature reports that patients with Ehler–Danlos syndrome had a history of hypermobility and a part of them referred the tendency to have mandibular luxation. Severe pain was reported in temporomandibular region and also noticeable in correspondence of masticatory muscles, probably due to the excessive joint excursion, ligamentous injuries, and parafunctions.[22] Bruxism is most common stress and when is combined with Ehler–Danlos syndrome, the effects are substantially amplified, particularly in patients with craniocervical instability.[23] In this research, most common pain was in correspondence of articulation points and temporalis, external pterygoideus muscles and masseters with a severe intensity and chronic frequency. Patients with hypermobile TMJ will often have increased maximal mouth opening range (40–55 mm)[1],[9] with mandibular subluxation, expression of the lack of proprioception, and ligamentous laxity. This phenomenon leads to soft-tissue injuries, repeated microtraumatism and disc dislocations. Disc displacement with reduction (mono or bilateral, with or without pain) was a recurring feature in our sample and confirmed by the literature.[14] Disc displacements without reduction and limited mouth opening were not noticed, unlike what said in the literature.[15],[16]

Headache is another common complaint of this kind of patients. JACOME [24] first described headache as a possible neurologic presentation of Ehler–danlos Syndrome. Clinical forms of headaches include migraine with aura, migraine without aura, tension headache, a combination of tension headache and migraine, and posttraumatic headache. This finding was repeatedly confirmed in the scientific literature [25],[26],[27] and also recognizable in this study. Cervical spine hypermobility is considered a common predisposing factor for this form of headache.[28] As confirmed in the literature,[29],[30] in this sample, TMJ dysfunctions and neck pain are additional predisposing factors to multiple forms of craniofacial pain and among these, headache.

In this research, cervical spine instability and pain are the comorbidities recognizable in all patients with Ehler–Danlos syndrome and TMD.

Psychological features

It is observed a reduced quality of life because of the early onset time of pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance and because of ineffective treatments.[31] Patients belonging to this sample have psychological implications, deriving from chronic pain and disability, as confirmed by Symptom-Checklist revised 90 questionnaires.

The analysis of psychological aspect is necessary also for the evaluation of the limits of response to therapy. Perception of pain is influenced by psychological disturbances; therefore, the proposal of psychological intervention should be required.

Digital evaluation

Surface electromyography of jaw muscles was performed to assess the “occlusal-muscular” balance. This kind of electromyography does not allow to evaluate the muscular strength as an absolute value. It only relates muscular activity to occlusal findings since masticatory muscles cannot be “separate” from occlusal input. Therefore, the instrument could allow to identify and to intercept occlusal patterns that may disturb a formerly unstable articular/muscular condition.

Significant data emerged. The abnormal position of occlusal-muscular center of gravity shows the prevalent activity of temporalis muscles among masticatory muscles, due to prevalent anterior occlusal contacts (up to the first bicuspid). Anterior center of gravity is associated with dysfunctions because of the presence of a retrusive condylar component and because of the increased articular load.[32] There is the presence in these patients of parafunctions such as bruxism and clenching which may worsen the painful symptomatology and the perception of muscular fatigue.

In addition, symmetry indexes reported out of normal range values. All these indexes are related to a balance that should be noticeable between right and left side in patients with an occlusal-muscular equilibrium. In our sample, they indicated that, in about two-thirds, there is an asymmetrical muscular activity between two sides, on the basis of the occlusal contacts. This could lead to an overload of the TMJs and masticatory muscles, to a retrusion of the condyle of the mandibular deviation side and wider balancing movements of the contralateral condyle. This can be worsen by the lack of proprioception and instability that cannot allow muscles to find a balance on the basis of occlusal contacts. To choice the most adequate treatment plan, it is necessary to verify if these EMG results are the expression of concomitant alterated occlusal patters or also due to the articular/muscular “instability” typical of this syndrome. For these patients, double-phase treatment should be assessed. The first phase is a gnathological treatment with functional-orthopedics issues; the second one is a conservative occlusal therapy to finalize goals achieved with the previous one.

Limitations of the study

  • Learning curve of acquisition of skills for what concerning diagnosis and therapy, for dental practitioners
  • Increased time to collect patients due to the rarity of the disease
  • Difficulty to increase awareness of the importance of gnathologic diagnosis and therapy among the patients.


Advantages of the study

  • Standardized protocol that allows to reach a correct diagnosis in view of individualized treatments
  • Direct contact between the Department of Rare disease and the Department of Oral Sciences, as centers of reference for this disease, with the opportunity to visit almost the totality of patients with syndrome.


As stated above, the purpose of this study is to find clinical and digital features to improve temporomandibular and general symptomatology with specific treatments. The future research will concern the treatment flowchart for each joint/pain disorder (DC/TMD). The phase of articular repositioning with splints and proprioceptive education with myofunctional devices has started for all patients. Physical therapy in cranio-cervical district has been integrated in a therapeutic protocol. One-year follow-up is requested before collecting and analyze data for each patient.

Every patient also follows an integrated multidisciplinary approach which contributes to improve cranio-cervical symptomatology:

  • Neurologic supervision to control the vascular aspect and types of headache
  • Orthopedic and physiatric supervision to evaluate the level of bone mineralization and the entity of dysfunction in the cervical spine.


The sample size will be widened of year in year.


   Conclusion Top


Ehler–Danlos syndromes are complex clinical conditions which need a multidisciplinary integrated approach to solve their several critical aspects. The involvement of TMJs and related structures in this syndrome and its impact on painful symptomatology and disability requires an expert examination. The aim is to prevent TMJ injuries, to intercept and treat incoming disorders, finding good articular stability. The detection of comorbidities and psychological aspects helps to improve as far as possible the results of therapy.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Norton LA, Assael LA. Orthodontic and temporomandibular joint considerations in treatment of patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:75-84.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Abel MD, Carrasco LR. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: Classifications, oral manifestations, and dental considerations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:582-90.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Conti PC, Pinto-Fiamengui LM, Cunha CO, Conti AC. Orofacial pain and temporomandibular disorders: The impact on oral health and quality of life. Braz Oral Res 2012;26 Suppl 1:120-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Buckingham RB, Braun T, Harinstein DA, Oral K, Bauman D, Bartynski W, et al. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome: A close association with systemic joint laxity (the hypermobile joint syndrome) Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:514-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Harinstein D, Buckingham RB, Braun T, Oral K, Bauman DH, Killian PJ, et al. Systemic joint laxity (the hypermobile joint syndrome) is associated with temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:1259-64.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Westling L, Mattiasson A. Background factors in craniomandibular disorders: Reported symptoms in adolescents with special reference to joint hypermobility and oral parafunctions. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:48-54.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Westling L. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction and systemic joint laxity. Swed Dent J 1992;81:1-79.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
De Coster PJ, Van den Berghe LI, Martens LC. Generalized joint hypermobility and temporomandibular disorders: Inherited connective tissue disease as a model with maximum expression. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:47-57.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Hirsch C, John MT, Stang A. Association between generalized joint hypermobility and signs and diagnoses of temporomandibular disorders. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:525-30.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kavuncu V, Sahin S, Kamanli A, Karan A, Aksoy C. The role of systemic hypermobility and condylar hypermobility in temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome. Rheumatol Int 2006;26:257-60.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Diep D, Fau V, Wdowik S, Bienvenu B, Bénateau H, Veyssière A, et al. Temporomandibular disorders and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type: A case-control study. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale 2016;117:228-33.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Winocur E, Gavish A, Halachmi M, Bloom A, Gazit E. Generalized joint laxity and its relation with oral habits and temporomandibular disorders in adolescent girls. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:614-22.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Pasinato F, Souza JA, Corrêa EC, Silva AM. Temporomandibular disorder and generalized joint hypermobility: Application of diagnostic criteria. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2011;77:418-25.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Nosouhian S, Haghighat A, Mohammadi I, Shadmehr E, Davoudi A, Badrian H, et al. Temporomandibular joint hypermobility manifestation based on clinical observations. J Int Oral Health 2015;7:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hagberg C, Berglund B, Korpe L, Andersson-Norinder J. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) focusing on oral symptoms: A questionnaire study. Orthod Craniofac Res 2004;7:178-85.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Berglund B, Björck E. Women with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome experience low oral health-related quality of life. J Orofac Pain 2012;26:307-14.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Castori M, Voermans NC. Neurological manifestations of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (s): A review. Iran J Neurol 2014;13:190-208.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Guilleminault C, Primeau M, Chiu HY, Yuen KM, Leger D, Metlaine A, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A genetic model of OSA. Chest 2013;144:1503-11.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network* and orofacial pain special interest group†. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6-27.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Young DM, Mentes JC, Titler MG. Acute pain management protocol. J Gerontological Nurs 1999;25:10-21.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Mitakides J, Tinkle BT. Oral and mandibular manifestations in the Ehler-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet 2017;175:220-5.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Voermans NC, Knoop H, Bleijenberg G, van Engelen BG. Pain in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is common, severe, and associated with functional impairment. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;40:370-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Ines M, Ferao B, Traebert J. Prevalence of temporomandibular dysfunction in patients with cervical pain under physiotherapy treatment. Fisioter Mov 2008;21:63-70.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Jacome DE. Headache in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Cephalalgia 1999;19:791-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Castori M, Sperduti I, Celletti C, Camerota F, Grammatico P. Symptom and joint mobility progression in the joint hypermobility syndrome (Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type). Clin Exp Rheumatol 2011;29:998-1005.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Bendik EM, Tinkle BT, Al-shuik E, Levin L, Martin A, Thaler R, et al. Joint hypermobility syndrome: A common clinical disorder associated with migraine in women. Cephalalgia 2011;31:603-13.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Rombaut L, Malfait F, Cools A, De Paepe A, Calders P. Musculoskeletal complaints, physical activity and health-related quality of life among patients with the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1339-45.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Rozen TD, Roth JM, Denenberg N. Cervical spine joint hypermobility: A possible predisposing factor for new daily persistent headache. Cephalalgia 2006;26:1182-5.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Castori M, Camerota F, Celletti C, Danese C, Santilli V, Saraceni VM, et al. Natural history and manifestations of the hypermobility type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A pilot study on 21 patients. Am J Med Genet A 2010;152A: 556-64.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
De Coster PJ, Martens LC, De Paepe A. Oral health in prevalent types of Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. J Oral Pathol Med 2005;34:298-307.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Rombaut L, Malfait F, De Paepe A, Rimbaut S, Verbruggen G, De Wandele I, et al. Impairment and impact of pain in female patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A comparative study with fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:1979-87.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
De Felício CM, Mapelli A, Sidequersky FV, Tartaglia GM, Sforza C. Mandibular kinematics and masticatory muscles EMG in patients with short lasting TMD of mild-moderate severity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2013;23:627-33.  Back to cited text no. 32
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (744 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1785    
    Printed25    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded140    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal