Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions| Reviewers

Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 359    
     


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 279-285
Numerical three-dimensional finite element modeling of cavity shape and optimal material selection by analysis of stress distribution on class V cavities of mandibular premolars


1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Pharmacology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India
4 Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission19-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance02-Apr-2020
Date of Web Publication19-Jun-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Nithesh Naik
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka.
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_75_20

Rights and Permissions

   Abstract 

Aim: Adhesive restoration does not depend primarily on the configuration of the shape of the cavity. Under varying loading conditions, it is essential to know the stress concentration and load transfer mechanism for distinct cavity shapes. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the biomechanical characteristics of various cavity shapes, namely oval, elliptical, trapezoidal, and rectangular shapes of class V cavities on mandibular premolars restored with amalgam, glass ionomer cement, and Cention N using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: A 3D prototype of a mandibular premolar was generated by Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images obtained from the cone beam computed tomography and imported to 3D modeling software tool, SpaceClaim. The four distinct load magnitudes of 100, 150, 200, and 250N were applied as a pressure load perpendicular to the lingual plane of the lingual cusp of the occlusal surface (normal load) and at 45° to same (oblique load). The stress distribution patterns and the maximum von Mises stresses were analyzed and compared. Results: The occlusal stresses were distributed from the force loading point in an approximate actinomorphic pattern, and when the force load was close to the margin, the stress was much greater. Conclusion: Ovoid cavity showed lesser stress concentration and deformation for each of the tested restorative material.


Keywords: Cavity shapes, dental materials, dentistry, finite element analysis, restoration, Stress distribution


How to cite this article:
Pai S, Bhat V, Patil V, Naik N, Awasthi S, Nayak N. Numerical three-dimensional finite element modeling of cavity shape and optimal material selection by analysis of stress distribution on class V cavities of mandibular premolars. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2020;10:279-85

How to cite this URL:
Pai S, Bhat V, Patil V, Naik N, Awasthi S, Nayak N. Numerical three-dimensional finite element modeling of cavity shape and optimal material selection by analysis of stress distribution on class V cavities of mandibular premolars. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 5];10:279-85. Available from: http://www.jispcd.org/text.asp?2020/10/3/279/287191





   Introduction Top


Noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) are wedge or saucer-shaped defects on the teeth attributed to erosion, abrasion, and occlusal loading.[1] Cervical lesion changes the distribution of stress within a tooth. Grippo[2] suggested that if the lesion were left unrestored, the stress concentration caused by the cervical lesion would facilitate further deterioration of tooth structure. Conventionally, silver amalgam was used as a restorative material in cervical lesions, but its toxic nature due to mercury and unaesthetic appearance hindered its usage. The retention rates of restorative materials significantly depend on the constant occlusal loading and their mechanical properties.[3] Lopes et al.[4] suggested that the bond created by adhesive restorative materials structurally reinforced restored tooth when compared to nonadhesive restoration techniques and seals the cavity from oral fluids and bacteria. Composite resins are widely used to restore cervical lesions but they have a major drawback of shrinkage due to polymerization reaction, thus creating mechanical stresses between the cavity walls and the filling. Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is an adhesive restorative material, which is less technique sensitive as compared to composite resins, and provides an adequate strength to be used in NCCLs.[5] Under eccentric loading, the frequency of marginal gaps is seen to be higher for the composite when compared with GIC.[6] Alkasites are a new class of dental restorative material, which have toothlike appearance and high flexure strength; hence, their demand has increased in recent past.[7]

As the shape of the cavity depends on the material used for filling, sharp cavity angles in accordance with Black’s principle can influence the modified stress and strain distribution, compared to the adhesive cavity type.[8] Studies on the stress distribution on NCCL state that maximum stress is seen at the apex of the lesion.[9],[10] It has been proven that the lesion shape and depth influence the development of tensile stresses along the interfaces of the GIC restoration.[11] Researchers have carried out several studies to identify the influence of cavity shapes on the restorative materials and the stress concentration in the restored tooth.[12],[13],[14]

The finite element assessment is an emerging technology, which is widely used for modeling and simulating the circumstances of dental treatment, the procedures engaged, and the impacts of posttreatment.[15] Cention N has shown comparable stress values as that of GIC in the cervical lesion.[16] As there are no studies in the literature comparing various cavity shapes and the stress distribution between GIC and Cention N, we hypothesized that there is no influence of the cavity shapes on the material choice for the restoration and the pattern of stress in the cervical area. Hence, the aim of this study was to understand the influence of various class V cavity shapes on mandibular premolars on stress concentration for amalgam, GIC, and Cention N under vertical and oblique occlusal loading.


   Materials and Methods Top


Setting and design

This finite element analysis was performed over 6 months (June 2019 to December 2019) in the institutional computer-assisted designing (CAD) lab after obtaining the institutional ethics committee clearance (IEC number 881-2018).

FE model generation

The study used Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images obtained from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to generate a three-dimensional (3D) prototype of a mandibular premolar. The images in DICOM format were imported to 3D modeling software tool, SpaceClaim. The obtained file was converted to Initial Graphics Exchange Specification (IGES) format, and the model included All the layers of the tooth-enamel, dentin and cementum. The CAD software tool was used to refine the layout of internal contours, edges, and occlusal anatomy. The finite element (FE) analysis was performed in ANSYS Workbench version 19.0 (Swanson ANSYS, Houston, Pennsylvania).

Material properties

The mechanical properties of the considered materials for the analysis were assumed homogeneous, isotropic, and linearly elastic and are listed in [Table 1]. The cavities were tested with three distinctive restorative materials, namely amalgam, GIC, and Cention N, which have different bonding mechanisms to the tooth structure.
Table 1: Mechanical properties of the tooth and supporting structures used in the study

Click here to view


Preparation of the cavity

A cavity with a continuous cross section across the mesio-distal-occlusal wall was made with a depth of 1 mm axially such that, 0.5 mm of the cavity was in cementum. The occluso-gingival length was 1.5 mm and the mesio distal width was maintained at approximately 3 mm for the various cavity shapes.[3] Four distinct cavity forms, namely crescent, ovular ellipse, trapezium, and rectangular, were regarded to examine the impact of cavity form over stress concentration. These cavities were developed so that the cervical margins were symmetrical. The region of the cavities considered was therefore equivalent to the surface area of the cavities. To eliminate other factors, the surface area of cavities was taken into consideration and was kept equal. Further, the characteristics of each material were assigned.

Meshing

The CAD model was then exported to finite element analysis software ANSYS Workbench software, version 19, and subjected to medium meshing and was refined using body sizing feature with element size 0. 5 mm with tetrahedral elements. [Figure 1] shows finite element meshed model of mandibular premolar tooth of different cavity shapes.
Figure 1: Finite element meshed model of mandibular premolar tooth. (A) Crescent. (B) Oval. (C) Rectangle. (D) Trapezium

Click here to view


Boundary conditions

The load was applied on the occlusal surface of the tooth to simulate a mastication process. Two cases were considered; in the first case, the occlusal load was applied normally to the cuspal inclines, whereas in the second case, two loads were applied, one load acting normally to the cuspal inclines and the other load acting at an angle of 45° to the occlusal surface. The portion of the restorative material, inserted was regarded as fixed support. The four distinct load magnitudes of 100, 150, 200, and 250N were applied as a pressure load perpendicular to the lingual plane of the lingual cusp of the occlusal surface (normal load) and at 45° to the same (oblique load).[17]

Mesh convergence test

The mesh convergence test plays a crucial role in determining the precision with computational reduction. The density of gross, medium, and fine mesh is considered for mesh convergence research. The study assesses and determines the effect of mesh quality on the results of simulation. All tooth layers were smoothened with adaptive size and varied the center of relevance to coarse, medium, and fine mesh with the maximum pressurized load of 250N for trapezium-shaped cavity.[18]


   Results Top


FE analysis

The mesh convergence test performed shows that the values of stress variation and deformation rates are approximately less than 2%–5% as shown in [Table 2]. The variation in the values of stress and total deformation were negligibly small when a mesh type of medium and fine was considered. The study was carried out with the medium mesh type with 55,037 nodes and 31,011 elements. In addition, an optimized mesh density test for the mesh convergence test in the cavity region took into account the element size of 0.5 mm.
Table 2: Mesh convergence study

Click here to view


Von Mises (VM) stress concentration and total deformation of the cavity were recorded for the different magnitude of loads, distinct cavities, and different restorative materials as shown in [Table 3]. In every model, the peak VM stress occurred at the force load sites, and the VM stress was spread from the loading point in an approximate actinomorphic pattern on the occlusal surface. The VM stress improved dramatically as the cavity margin approached the load points. In both cases of normal and combined (vertical plus oblique) loading, the stresses in the cavity with restorative material amalgam were highest, and that of GIC was minimal. The distribution of VM stress on class V restored cavity when a normal load and a combination of normal and oblique load were applied is shown in [Figure 2] and [Figure 3], respectively, for the four models considered in the study.
Table 3: Distribution of von Mises stress for class V restored cavity

Click here to view
,
Figure 2: The distribution of von Mises stress on the class V restored cavity for a normal load of 250N. (A) Trapezium. (B) Rectangle. (C) Oval. (D) Crescent

Click here to view
,
Figure 3: The distribution of von Mises stress on class V restored cavity for a combined (normal and oblique) load of 250N. (A) Trapezium. (B) Rectangle. (C) Oval. (D) Crescent

Click here to view


The maximum and minimum stress values are compared with the vertical and oblique occlusal forces of enamel, dentin, and dental fillings of restored teeth with different materials with different cavity shapes. The total deformation is observed in the restored cavity region to decide on the retention of the restorative material for the longer duration for enhanced life.


   Discussion Top


Cervical lesions are prevalent, and dentists find their treatment a significant challenge due to the place at which these lesions are present. Long-term success is therefore difficult to achieve. This study used FEM to analyze this problem, as it is an appropriate way to perform clear and objective biological systems monitoring.[15] The effect of different cavity shapes and restoration materials, in terms of possible changes at the restorative material–tooth interface, was studied. The results indicated that both restorative material and cavity shape influence the stress concentration around the cervical region. Cavities having large cavosurface angle tend to have a low concentration of stress, which are confirmed by finite element analysis of axis symmetric models.[19] As class V cavities are mainly present at the fixed end/fulcrum point of the tooth, they tend to fail due to flexural stress.[20]

In this study, the VM stress values increased when the loads were increased. It was seen to be higher in the oblique loading as compared with the normal occlusal loading. The least amount of stress was seen in oval-shaped cavity, restored with GIC, and the highest was seen in trapezoidal cavity restored with amalgam. The ovoid-shaped cavity showed the least stress values with all the three restorative materials. This is in agreement with a similar study by Ziemiecki et al.[19] who suggested that deep notch-shaped lesions were less effective in retaining adhesive restorations than shallow saucer-shaped lesions, and attributed to the fact that shapes having sharper edges tend to have high stress concentration. A wedge-shaped cavity with a shorter occlusal wall, restored with giomers and adhesive, with a tensile strength exceeding 25MPa has been suggested by a FEM study.[21] Turning a wedge-shaped cavity into a wedge-shaped cavity with a shorter occlusal wall (a minimally invasive maneuver in comparison with creating a round-shaped cavity), and restoration with giomers can increase the retention of the restoration.[22] It has been determined that the thickness of dentin around the cavity plays a significant role in stress and strain distribution.[23] However, in this study, the surface area of all the shapes was kept constant and only the shapes were altered. Therefore, the shape of the cavity is a determining factor for stress distribution. GIC and Cention N bond to the tooth structure unlike amalgam. These two materials have shown comparable stress distribution. Cention N is a new dental material, which is an Alkasite consisting of a special patented filler (Isofiller), which acts as a shrinkage stress reliever. When the material polymerizes, there is a cross-linking between the monomer chains located on the fillers and the silanes.[7] These forces between the individual fillers come into play, which place stress on the cavity walls.

The failure of cervical restorations has been reported to be higher in materials having high Young’s modulus, and in mandibular teeth.[24],[25] Amalgam with the highest modulus of elasticity has shown higher stress value. Stress concentration can be further reduced by establishing a well-defined finish line or chamfer line along the cervical edge of the defects.[26] Further, in this study, total deformation of all three tested materials was less in oval design at increasing load in normal and oblique direction. It has been suggested that to reduce stress, use of more compliant restorative materials, that is, flexible materials, such as GIC, flowable composites, or nano-filled adhesives, under resin dental filling materials, could be helpful.[27]

On the basis of this FEM simulation, clinically, it can be implied that an ovoid preparation in the cervical area with a chemically bonded restorative material has lesser stress distribution and deformation. Hence, the null hypothesis was rejected. More investigations are needed to understand what may be the optimal cavity shape, which reduces crack failure risks, and optimization procedures could be integrated in the proposed CAD–FEM approach. There is a scope for further clinical trials for the comparison of the retention rate of GIC and Cention N.


   Conclusion Top


The following conclusions were derived from this study:

  1. Oblique occlusal load showed more stress as compared with normal occlusal with an increase in magnitude.


  2. Trapezoid cavity filled with amalgam showed the highest stress concentration but produced relatively less deformation of the cavity for the same amount of load.


  3. Ovoid-shaped cavity showed less stress concentration and deformation, compared to all the other shapes under consideration.


  4. Minimum stress was observed in GIC, and the results are comparable with that of Cention N.


Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India, for providing the lab facilities for the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Not Applicable.

Ethical policy and institutional review board statement

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, IEC No. 883–2018, dated December 11, 2018. All the procedures have been performed as per the ethical guidelines laid down by the Declaration of Helsinki (2013).

Patient declaration of consent

Not Applicable.

Data availability statement

Not Applicable.



 
   References Top

1.
Nascimento MM, Dilbone DA, Pereira PN, Duarte WR, Geraldeli S, Delgado AJ. Abfraction lesions: Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2016;8:79-87.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Grippo JO. Noncarious cervical lesions: The decision to ignore or restore. J Esthet Dent 1992;4:55-64.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Guler MS, Guler C, Cakici F, Cakici EB, Sen S. Finite element analysis of thermal stress distribution in different restorative materials used in class V cavities. Niger J Clin Pract 2016;19:30-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Lopes LM, Leitao JG, Douglas WH. Effect of a new resin inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement. Quintessence Int 1991;22:641-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Boing TF, de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Gomes OMM. Are glass-ionomer cement restorations in cervical lesions more long-lasting than resin-based composite resins? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2018;20:435-52.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Anhesini BH, Landmayer K, Nahsan FPS, Pereira JC, Honório HM, Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF. Composite vs. ionomer vs. mixed restoration of wedge-shaped dental cervical lesions: Marginal quality relative to eccentric occlusal loading. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019;91:309-14.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Todd JC. Scientific Documentation: Cention N. Schaan, Liechtenstein: Ivoclar-Vivadent Press; 2016. p. 1-58.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Black GV, Black AD. A Work on Operative Dentistry in Two Volumes. (Vol. 1) Medico-dental Publishing Company; London, H. Kimpton 1920.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Jeon SJ, Park JK, Kim HC, Woo SG, Kim KH, Son K, et al. Effects of occlusal load on the stress distribution of four cavity configurations of noncarious cervical lesions: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2006;31:359-70.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kaushik M, Kumar U, Sharma R, Mehra N, Rathi A. Stress distribution in endodontically treated abfracted mandibular premolar restored with different cements and crowns: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Conserv Dent 2018;21:557-61.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
11.
Ichim I, Schmidlin PR, Kieser JA, Swain MV. Mechanical evaluation of cervical glass-ionomer restorations: 3D finite element study. J Dent 2007;35:28-35.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Chowdhury D, Guha C, Desai P. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of dental amalgam, Z350 composite resin and Cention-N restoration in class II cavity. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2018;4:52-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK, Von Hagen S. Microleakage of compomer class V restorations: Effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:194-203.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ichim IP, Schmidlin PR, Li Q, Kieser JA, Swain MV. Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: Part II. Restorative material selection to minimise fracture. Dent Mat 2007;23:1562-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Meira JB, Jikihara AN, Capetillo P, Roscoe MG, Cattaneo PM, Ballester RY. Finite element analysis in dentistry. Dent Biomater 2018;2:67.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Pai S, Naik N, Patil V, Kaur J, Awasti S, Nayak N. Evaluation and comparison of stress distribution in restored cervical lesions of mandibular premolars: Three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2019;9:605-11.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Rees JS. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions: A finite element study. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:188-93.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Patil V, Noronha DJ, Naik N, Shettar M. A comparative study on the effect of stress in dental implant structure using finite element analysis. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev 2019;9:709-17.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ziemiecki TL, Dennison JB, Charbeneau GT. Clinical evaluation of cervical composite resin restorations placed without retention. Oper Dent 1987;12:27-33.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Eliguzeloglu E, Eraslan O, Omurlu H, Eskitascioglu G, Belli S. The effect of cavity shape and hybrid layer on the stress distribution of cervical composite restorations. Eur J Dent 2011;5:180-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Florescu A, Pangica AM, Hancu V, Manu R, Biclesanu CF. FEM study regarding materials retention used for abfraction adhesive restoration. Mat Plast 2016;53:689.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Florescu A, Manea S, Hancu V, Manu R, Biclesanu CF. The influence of cervical cavity shape on the restoration material retention. Mat Plast 2017;54:111.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Wang R, Niu L, Li Q, Liu Q, Zuo H. The peritubular reinforcement effect of porous dentine microstructure. PLoS One2017;12:1-15.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Wierichs RJ, Kramer EJ, Meyer-Lueckel H. Risk factors for failure of class V restorations of carious cervical lesions in general dental practices. J Dent 2018;77:87-92.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Correia AM, Bresciani E, Borges AB, Pereira DM, Maia LC, Caneppele TM. Do tooth-and cavity-related aspects of noncarious cervical lesions affect the retention of resin composite restorations in adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Operative Dentistry2020 Feb 13: In Press.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Leinfelder KF. Restoration of abfracted lesions. Compendium 1994;15:1396, 1398-400; quiz 1400.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Kampanas NS, Antoniadou M. Glass ionomer cements for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions in the geriatric patient. J Funct Biomater 2018;9:42.  Back to cited text no. 27
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (2,346 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed63    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded31    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal