Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions| Reviewers

Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 1127    
     

    Article Cited by others

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A comparative evaluation of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine in mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: A clinical study

Maruthingal Sunith, Mohan Dennis, Maroli Ramesh Kumar, Alahmari Ali, Alqahtani Ahmed, Alsadoon Mohammed

Year : 2015| Volume: 5| Issue : 6 | Page no: 463-469

   This article has been cited by
 
1 Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia
Geoffrey St George,Alyn Morgan,John Meechan,David R Moles,Ian Needleman,Yuan-Ling Ng,Aviva Petrie
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Efficacy of buccal infiltration anaesthesia with articaine for extraction of mandibular molars: a clinical trial
F. Rayati,A. Noruziha,R. Jabbarian
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 Comparison of Articaine and Lidocaine for Buccal Infiltration After Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block For Intraoperative Pain Control During Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery
Geraldo Prisco da Silva-Junior,Liane Maciel de Almeida Souza,Francisco Carlos Groppo
Anesthesia Progress. 2017; 64(2): 80
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]

 

Read this article