Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry

REVIEW ARTICLE
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 142--147

Decoding the perplexing mystery of para-chloroaniline formation: A systematic review


Mohd. Sibghatullah Khatib1, Bilal Ameer2, Nikita Ajit Mannur2, Amith Madi Ramalingaiahsetty2, Sayed Mateen Peerzade3, Amrut Bambawale4,  
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. Syamala Reddy Dental College Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, India
2 SJM Dental College and Hospital, Chitradurga, India
3 KLE Viswanath Katti Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
4 Apollo White Dental Clinic, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Mohd. Sibghatullah Khatib
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. Syamala Reddy Dental College Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore 560037, Karnataka.
India

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this article was to understand and decode the mystery of the formation of para-chloroaniline (PCA). The ingredient of the brown precipitate after mixing sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) is still in debate. Materials and Methods: Various studies adopt a different methodology to substantiate that it may contain PCA, which is a carcinogenic agent. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the relationship between PCA and brown precipitate. Two reviewers independently conducted a comprehensive literature search. The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched. In addition, the bibliographies were manually searched. There was no disagreement between the two reviewers. This review was reported and conducted in step with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Of 233 articles, only 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. Available scientific evidence was more supportive that the brown precipitate form after mixing NaOCl and CHX may form para-chloroamide moiety rather than free PCA, and PCA may be the by-product of CHX degradation. Conclusion: On the basis of the current evidence and data extracted from the various databases, it can be concluded that the mixture of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine does not form PCA, and PCA may be the by-product of high concentrated chlorhexidine. Further studies are required to substantiate the evidence.



How to cite this article:
Khatib MS, Ameer B, Ajit Mannur N, Madi Ramalingaiahsetty A, Peerzade SM, Bambawale A. Decoding the perplexing mystery of para-chloroaniline formation: A systematic review.J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2020;10:142-147


How to cite this URL:
Khatib MS, Ameer B, Ajit Mannur N, Madi Ramalingaiahsetty A, Peerzade SM, Bambawale A. Decoding the perplexing mystery of para-chloroaniline formation: A systematic review. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 11 ];10:142-147
Available from: http://www.jispcd.org/text.asp?2020/10/2/142/282838


Full Text



 Introduction



Persistent infection due to remnant infected dentinal debris bacteria is the cause of root canal failure.[1] Therefore, to obtain a sterilized canal, irrigation plays a crucial role.[2] The most common irrigant with antimicrobial property is sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), but the increased concentration of NaOCl can be potentially toxic to the periapical tissue.[3],[4]

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) was introduced as an alternative against NaOCl with the good antimicrobial property but a lack of tissue dissolution capacity.[5],[6],[7] The introduction of chlorhexidine in the presence of NaOCl into the canal leads to the formation of brown precipitate due to acid–base reaction that extends up to 139–684 µm, which deteriorate the sealing of the root canal.[8] Some of the previously published studies claim the presence of the para-chloroaniline (PCA) in the brown precipitate,[9],[10],[11],[12] but another study denies the concept of the formation of PCA.[13],[14]

Previous study was unable to substantiate the formation of PCA. It is important to understand that mixing NaOCl and CHX forms PCA or not because PCA known to be carcinogenic and may cause methemoglobinemia.[15],[16],[17],[18],[19]

To date, the formation of PCA due to NaOCl and CHX remains vague. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate whether PCA is formed through the reaction of mixing NaOCl and CHX.

 Materials and Methods



The protocol for this systematic review was developed following established guidelines.[20] The protocol was prepared and matched the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for systematic reviews. The focused question was adjusted according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) criteria for comparing laboratory studies as follows: Population (specimens or extracted teeth); Intervention and Comparison (interaction between NaOCl and CHX); Outcome (PCA formation).[21]

Search strategy

A literature search was performed using the U.S. National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases. Articles were included up to and including August 29, 2019.

In addition, bibliography of articles and textbooks were manually searched. Two reviewers (M.S. and B.A.) independently searched the article and abstract based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. All potential studies were analyzed and assessed completely. Only studies published in English were included.

Inclusion criteria

In vitro studies were considered and studies evaluating PCA formation were included.

Exclusion criteria

Case series, cell culture laboratory studies, or animal studies were excluded.

 Results



Flowchart of this systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines is presented in [Figure 1]. Of 233 studies, 13 met the inclusion criteria.{Figure 1}

Study selection

After the database screening and the removal of duplicates, 233 studies were identified. After screening the titles, 22 were left. It was further reduced to 13 after the examination of abstracts and full texts.

Characteristics of included articles

This review includes studies published in English. The characteristics of 13 included studies are listed in [Table 1] and [Table 2]. Ten articles focused on the combination of NaOCl and CHX to analyze the formation of PCA, and the remaining three articles analyzed degradation and stability of CHX at various concentrations.{Table 1}, {Table 2}

The various analytical methodologies used to detect PCA formation are listed in [Table 3].{Table 3}

 Discussion



This systematic review focused on any association between the identification of PCA and the analytical methods used for identification in various literature.

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

Three articles were identified to address a relationship between PCA formation and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.[10],[13],[14],[22-24] Two articles reported that the combination of NaOCl and CHX leads to the formation of PCA.[10],[13] Previous studies analyzed that CHX degradation at various concentrations liberates PCA,[22],[23],[24] whereas Orhan et al.14 reported that for the detection of PCA, mass spectrometry is not an appropriate method.

1h nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Five articles were identified, which assessed the PCA formation.[12],[14],[25-27] Even though 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a nondestructive method for detecting PCA, results of various studies vary. Three studies clearly mentioned the absence of free PCA in the NaOCl and CHX reaction.[14],[25],[27] On the contrary, two studies supported the formation of PCA.[12],[26] The spectrum interpretation performed between the range of 6.5–8.5 ppm followed by concluded that 7.0–8.0 ppm represent PCA but spectra result of the amino signal was included in the discussion. We contemplate that the inaccuracy of the results could be due to misinterpretation of para-chloro amide moiety of CHX or any derivative of CHX in the brown precipitate.[14] Orhan et al. single out the methodological error of the study by Arslan et al.[26] and bring down the curtain with the statement that the 1H NMR analysis was misunderstood and the result was misinterpreted.[29]

High-performance liquid chromatography and thin layer chromatography

Two articles assessed the PCA formation in NaOCl and CHX reaction.[12],[14] Even tough high-performance liquid chromatography is a nondestructive method to analyze the PCA formation, the results of both studies are completely different. Siddique et al.[12] supported the formation of free PCA but Orhan et al.[14] opposed it. However, Siddique et al.[12] were unable to mention para-chloro amide moiety of CHX. Therefore, their verification to justify free PCA formation may be inaccurate.

Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry

Two articles supported the PCA formation using time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS).[9],[11] The presence of PCA can be interpreted using TOF-SIMS but unable to differentiate between free PCA and amide moiety. TOF-SIMS showed the presence of PCA in the CHX group and NaOCl/CHX group. Hence TOF-SIMS cannot be a reliable method for detecting PCA.

Infrared spectroscopy

Two published studies examined PCA formation in the NaOCl/CHX mixture, and both studies denied PCA formation in the brown precipitate.[14],[27]

Column chromatography, electron spray ionization mass spectrometry, and ultraviolet

Only one study used column chromatography, electron spray ionization mass spectrometry, and ultraviolet to analyze the presence of PCA in the mixture.[12] However, this study discussed the value range for PCA but not about amide moiety; thus, the result of this study cannot be a cutoff proof for finding PCA in the mixture.

Stereomicroscopy

Krishnamurthy and Sudhakaran.[28] detected to confirm the presence of PCA using stereomicroscopy and NMR and concluded that intermediate flushing with saline can prevent the formation of PCA.

X-ray photon spectroscopy

Basrani et al.[9] confirmed the presence of PCA using X-ray photon spectroscopy and TOF-SIMS.

Neither Krishnamurthy and Sudhakaran[28] nor Basrani BR et al.[9] discussed para-chloro amide moiety of CHX or CHX derivative. Zong and Kirsch[30] tested the pH-dependant chlorhexidine instability and concluded that chlorhexidine degradation into PCA is more in an acidic medium as compared to the alkali medium, which could be the cutoff proof that NaOCl is not responsible for PCA formation due to its alkali nature.

NaOCl and CHX lead to an acid–base reaction that forms brown precipitate, which may contain para-chloro amide moiety indeed it disturbs the sealer penetration and may affect periapical seal,[25] or it is due to NaOCl that cause chlorination of the guanidino nitrogen of CHX.[32] But to date no conclusive methodology is available that clearly identify the by-product of NaOCl and CHX mixture. Many studies have been performed to solve the mystery of the brown precipitate; some studies supported and some opposed the PCA formation. It may be due to differences between the techniques; however, based on available data it is clear that the brown precipitate might contain aromatic ring, which might be the substitute of PCA.[25]

There is a concern that the brown precipitate, which is PCA according to some authors, is carcinogenic. Patil.[31] investigated the mutagenic potential of the brown precipitate by Ames test and concluded that the precipitate is free from carcinogenic elements.

Thus, from this systematic review, it can be concluded the PCA may be the degradation product of concentrated CHX and not the NaOCl/CHX mixture. In future, well-designed research methodologies are needed to address this question.

 Conclusion



On the basis of the provided evidence, we can conclude that NaOCl and CHX mixture does not contain free PCA.

We should understand that leaving the brown precipitate in the canal is terrible, so intermittent flushing should be performed to avoid precipitate formation.

Well-designed studies may able to provide cutoff proof of the absence of free PCA in NaOCl and CHX mixture.

Acknowledgment

Nil.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Mohd. Sibghatullah Khatib: Concepts, Design, Literature search. Bilal Ameer: Manuscript preparation. Nikita Ajit Mannur: Literature search. Amith Madi Ramalingaiahsetty: Data acquisition. Sayed Mateen Peerzade: Literature search. Amrut Bambawale: Manuscript review.

Ethical policy and institutional review board statement

To the best of the author(s) knowledge, this study has been conducted in full accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Patient declaration of consent

For the further development of medical treatment in, dentistry, the publishing of clinical pictures and treatment methods is indispensable. This is why I explicitly agree that all information collected during the course of the treatment, including picture, sound and video material – even if my person / child is recognizable – may be published for scientific as well as for educational purposes in the publishing group of JISPCD. The material may be linked with information about the disease pattern and the treatment methods, etc.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

1Moorer WR, Wesselink PR. Factors promoting the tissue dissolving capability of sodium hypochlorite. Int Endod J 1982;15:187-96.
2Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54:291-312.
3Clarkson RM, Kidd B, Evans GE, Moule AJ. The effect of surfactant on the dissolution of porcine pulpal tissue by sodium hypochlorite solutions. J Endod 2012;38:1257-60.
4Ehrich DG, Brian JD Jr, Walker WA. Sodium hypochlorite accident: Inadvertent injection into the maxillary sinus. J Endod 1993;19:180-2.
5Ohara P, Torabinejad M, Kettering JD. Antibacterial effects of various endodontic irrigants on selected anaerobic bacteria. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993;9:95-100.
6Naenni N, Thoma K, Zehnder M. Soft tissue dissolution capacity of currently used and potential endodontic irrigants. J Endod 2004;30:785-7.
7Okino LA, Siqueira EL, Santos M, Bombana AC, Figueiredo JA. Dissolution of pulp tissue by aqueous solution of chlorhexidine digluconate and chlorhexidine digluconate gel. Int Endod J 2004;37:38-41.
8Bui TB, Baumgartner JC, Mitchell JC. Evaluation of the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate and its effect on root dentin. J Endod 2008;34:181-5.
9Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RN, Fillery E, Manzur A. Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. J Endod 2007;33:966-9.
10Basrani BR, Manek S, Mathers D, Fillery E, Sodhi RN. Determination of 4-chloroaniline and its derivatives formed in the interaction of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine by using gas chromatography. J Endod 2010;36:312-4.
11Kolosowski KP, Sodhi RN, Kishen A, Basrani BR. Qualitative analysis of precipitate formation on the surface and in the tubules of dentin irrigated with sodium hypochlorite and a final rinse of chlorhexidine or QMiX. J Endod 2014;40:2036-40.
12Siddique R, Sureshbabu NM, Somasundaram J, Jacob B, Selvam D. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of precipitate formation following interaction of chlorhexidine with sodium hypochlorite, neem, and tulsi. J Conserv Dent 2019;22: 40-7.
13Mortenson D, Sadilek M, Flake NM, Paranjpe A, Heling I, Johnson JD, et al. The effect of using an alternative irrigant between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine to prevent the formation of para-chloroaniline within the root canal system. Int Endod J 2012;45:878-82.
14Orhan EO, Irmak Ö, Hür D, Yaman BC, Karabucak B. Does para-chloroaniline really form after mixing sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine? J Endod 2016;42:455-9.
15Boehncke A, Kielhorn J, Könnecker G, Pohlenz-Michel C, Mangelsdorf I. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 48: 4-Chloroaniline. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
16Chhabra RS, Huff JE, Haseman JK, Elwell MR, Peters AC. Carcinogenicity of p-chloroaniline in rats and mice. Food Chem Toxicol 1991;29:119-24.
17Ramsay DH, Harvey CC. Markingink poisoning: An outbreak of methaemoglobin cyanosis in newborn babies. Lancet 1959;1:910-2.
18Messmer AS, Nickel CH, Bareiss D. P-chloroaniline poisoning causing methemoglobinemia: A case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Emerg Med 2015;2015:208732.
19Kulkarni BS, Acharya VN, Khanna RM, Nath S, Mankodi RP, Raghavan P. Methemoglobinemia due to nitro-aniline intoxication. Review of the literature with a report of 9 cases. J Postgrad Med 1969;15:192-200.
20Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:264-9, W64.
21Forrest JL, Miller SA. Evidence-based decision making in action: Part 1—Finding the best clinical evidence. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002;3:10-26.
22Barbin LE, Saquy PC, Guedes DF, Sousa-Neto MD, Estrela C, Pécora JD. Determination of para-chloroaniline and reactive oxygen species in chlorhexidine and chlorhexidine associated with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 2008;34:1508-14.
23Barbin LE, Estrela C, Guedes DF, Spanó JC, Sousa-Neto MD, Pécora JD. Detection of para-chloroaniline, reactive oxygen species, and 1-chloro-4-nitrobenzene in high concentrations of chlorhexidine and in a mixture of chlorhexidine and calcium hydroxide. J Endod 2013;39:664-8.
24Câmara De Bem SH, Estrela C, Guedes DF, Sousa-Neto MD, Pécora JD. Determination of chemical components derived from 2% chlorhexidine gel degradation using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72:630-8.
25Thomas JE, Sem DS. An in vitro spectroscopic analysis to determine whether para-chloroaniline is produced from mixing sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. J Endod 2010;36:315-7.
26Arslan H, Uygun AD, Keskin A, Karatas E, Seçkin F, Yıldırım A. Evaluation of orange-brown precipitate formed in root canals after irrigation with chlorhexidine and QMix and spectroscopic analysis of precipitates produced by a mixture of chlorhexidine/NaOCl and QMix/NaOCl. Int Endod J 2015;48:1199-203.
27Irmak Ö, Orhan EO, Görgün K, Yaman BC. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and infrared spectroscopy analysis of precipitate formed after mixing sodium hypochlorite and QMix 2in1. PLoS One 2018;13:e0202081.
28Krishnamurthy S, Sudhakaran S. Evaluation and prevention of the precipitate formed on interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. J Endod 2010;36:1154-7.
29Orhan EO, Irmak O. Comments on misinterpretation of the proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic data of a previous study. Int Endod J 2019;52:1397-8.
30Zong Z, Kirsch LE. Studies on the instability of chlorhexidine, part I: Kinetics and mechanisms. J Pharm Sci 2012;101:2417-27.
31Patil P, Aminoshariae A, Harding J, Montagnese TA, Mickel A. Determination of mutagenicity of the precipitate formed by sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine using the Ames test. Aust Endod J 2016;42:16-21.
32Prado M, Santos Júnior HM, Rezende CM, Pinto AC, Faria RB, Simão RA, et al. Interactions between irrigants commonly used in endodontic practice: A chemical analysis. J Endod 2013;39:505-10.