|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 451-456
|Parental views on fluoride tooth brushing and its impact on oral health: A cross-sectional study
Mohammad Alshehri1, Omar Kujan2
1 Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine and University Hospitals, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Al-Farabi College for Dentistry and Nursing, Al-Farabi Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
|Date of Web Publication||26-Nov-2015|
Head Unit of Skills Development and Continuing Education, Al-Farabi College of Dentistry and Nursing, Al-Farabi Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Objective: This study aimed to describe the current use and knowledge about fluoride toothpaste and children's oral hygiene habits among parents of Saudi children. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the parents of children aged 7–12 years who visited the undergraduate pediatric dental clinics at the College of Dentistry in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia were interviewed. The interview included questions to assess the parents' level of fluoride knowledge, the dental appearance of their children, and any general dental health concerns and practices. Results: A total of 463 parents (women 55.5%, men 44.5%) were included. Over half (60.3%) of the participants reported that they were unhappy with the appearance of their child's teeth. Only 11.5% received high fluoride knowledge scores. The additive index for the level of fluoride knowledge was significantly lower among mothers than among fathers. The majority of the parents were not able to correctly report whether the toothpaste their children used contained fluoride. Furthermore, the majority of the respondents were unaware of the benefits of fluoride in preventing dental caries. Conclusions: There is a need to enhance parental knowledge regarding high fluoride intake and its harmful consequences on children's health. Both mothers and fathers should have higher levels of awareness regarding oral health promotion to maintain optimal oral health in their children.
Keywords: Children, fluoride, oral health, perception, survey
|How to cite this article:|
Alshehri M, Kujan O. Parental views on fluoride tooth brushing and its impact on oral health: A cross-sectional study. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2015;5:451-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Alshehri M, Kujan O. Parental views on fluoride tooth brushing and its impact on oral health: A cross-sectional study. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2015 [cited 2022 Aug 12];5:451-6. Available from: https://www.jispcd.org/text.asp?2015/5/6/451/167728
| Introduction|| |
Fluoride is a mineral that occurs naturally in many foods and water, and can help dental health to a large extent by strengthening the tooth enamel, making it more resistant to tooth decay. Although it provides protection against dental caries, fluoride consumed in large amounts during early childhood can have a negative impact on the teeth by causing dental fluorosis  and can cause both skeletal fluorosis (more than 6 mg/l) and deformation of bones in children and adults. Dental fluorosis is defined as a developmental disturbance of dental enamel caused by the consumption of excess fluoride during tooth development. Whereas the positive effects of fluoride in preventing dental caries are primarily due to its topical effects after tooth eruption, its negative effects are due to systemic absorption during tooth development. The levels and duration of fluoride exposure produce clinical results in terms of a patient's oral health.
Dental fluorosis is a developmental disturbance of the dental enamel that is primarily caused by exposure to a high concentration of fluoride, especially during tooth development. There is evidence to support the hypothesis that exposure to fluoride at higher than the recommended limits will result in tooth enamel defects. Dental fluorosis is usually an endemic condition, especially in regions with high fluoride concentrations in the drinking water. The optimal level of fluoride in drinking water is less than 0.9–1.0 ppm. It is worthy noting that a child living in an area with a non-fluoridated water supply and low (<0.3 ppm) natural fluoride levels has a risk for developing an early childhood dental decay. In addition, the total daily fluoride intake from all sources should not exceed 0.05–0.07 mg F/kg body weight in order to minimize the risk of dental fluorosis., A mottled appearance of the teeth is common in individuals with dental fluorosis. Mild forms of dental fluorosis manifest as tiny, opaque, white speckles located randomly on the teeth. More moderate forms of enamel fluorosis appear as small white specks.
In general, an increase in the opacity of tooth enamel is primarily due to an increase in porosity. The hypomineralized enamel is fragile, which results in damage to the tooth surface., Prior to the introduction of water fluoridation in the 1960s, diet was the primary source of fluoride exposure worldwide. Other sources include air pollution, toothpaste, mouth rinses, medicines, anesthetics, fluoride supplements, and pesticide and herbicide residues. The results of a fluoride mapping study performed in Saudi Arabia by Al-Dosari et al. indicated that the highest mean fluoride level was in the Hail region, with a value of 1.27 ppm. The majority of the regions (69%) had fluoride levels lower than the recommended level of 0.9–1.0 ppm, which indicates that fluoride supplementation through alternative sources may be beneficial in these populations. Another study by the same author  found that approximately 75% of the population in Riyadh and 6% of the population in the Qassim region were exposed to very low fluoride levels (0.00–0.03 ppm) and that less than 3% of the population in both regions was exposed to suboptimal fluoride levels ranging from 0.61 to 0.81 ppm. A larger percentage of the population in the Qassim region than in the Riyadh region (28.63% vs. 9.24%, respectively) was exposed to relatively high fluoride levels (>0.80 ppm).
Numerous studies have reported the relationships between the prevalence of dental fluorosis and the use of different fluoride sources, such as dietary fluoride supplements (lozenges, tablets),, fluoride toothpaste, and fluoridated water.,, An increase in the consumption of fluoridated water, in addition to the use of these supplemental fluoride sources, has increased the prevalence of fluorosis in many countries. McKnight et al. reported that fluorosis was noticeable and was regarded as unaesthetic, compared with various other dental conditions.
Reports state that moderate to severe forms of dental fluorosis are present among children who are exposed to low fluoride levels. Although this level of dental fluorosis is not a major public health concern, efforts should be made to reduce the prevalence of dental fluorosis. In addition, changes in individual perceptions regarding the aesthetic acceptability of enamel fluorosis could influence the implementation of caries preventative measures. When evaluating the level of exposure to fluoride, it is important to consider the different sources of fluoride and their effects on different age groups.
There is evidence to support the hypothesis that although the mild form of dental fluorosis does not cause any major aesthetic problems, the more severe forms can result in emotional distress. In a study that evaluated the psychosocial perceptions of dental fluorosis, the majority of the participants reported that individuals with stained teeth lacked social skills and exhibited low intelligence and poor psychological adjustment. One study evaluated the perceived oral health status and its relationship with clinically assessed dental fluorosis among schoolchildren in Tanzania. The results indicated that more than 50% of boys and 68% of girls were dissatisfied with the appearance of their teeth. Parental education and attitudes regarding fluoride consumption and harmful excessive intake are of great importance. However, there is no study on the parental views of dental fluoride published from Saudi Arabia, to the best of our knowledge.
| Materials and Methods|| |
In this cross-sectional study, the parents of children aged 7–12 years who visited the undergraduate pediatric dental clinics at the Riyadh College of Dentistry and Pharmacy were recruited randomly and equally from the three clinical campuses for a 6-month period beginning from October 2011. The three campuses are located in the areas of Riyadh City that have different socio-economic statuses but the same fluoride level in the water. The parents signed written consent forms, and ethical approval for the study was received from the College of Dentistry Research Center (CDRC) at King Saud University (no. NF 2348).
The study participants were interviewed in the waiting area by student interns. The interview included questions aimed at determining the parents' perceptions regarding fluoride and their knowledge about the harmful effects of excessive fluoride intake. An additive index (Qn11–Qn15) was used to measure the levels of fluoride knowledge among the mothers and fathers. A correct answer was coded as one, and an incorrect answer was coded as zero. On the basis of the additive indices, the scales were subsequently categorized into three levels of fluoride knowledge: Low (scores 0–2), middle (scores 3–5), and high (scores 6–7).
The participants were asked to report the brand name of the toothpaste that their child had used during the last month. Information available from manufacturers was used to determine whether the reported brand contained fluoride, and this information was recorded as the actual use of toothpaste containing fluoride. The participants were also asked to report the type of toothpaste (fluoridated, non-fluoridated, or unknown fluoride status) that their child currently used, and these responses were recorded as the self-reported use of fluoride toothpaste. The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows ®; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), with P < 0.05 as the cut-off level for significance.
| Results|| |
More than half (60.26%) of the participants reported that they were not happy with the appearance of their child's teeth in general (but not specifically the appearance related to fluorosis) [Table 1]. When asked about brushing habits, the majority of the participants (65.23%) reported that their child brushed once daily and with parental help only. The amount of toothpaste used varied among the respondents, but the largest group of respondents (47.73%) preferred half the length of the toothbrush bristles. Approximately 30% of the parents reported that their child used fluoride toothpaste. However, based on information obtained from the manufacturers of the toothpaste brands used by the children in the study, 55% were using fluoride toothpaste. More than half (54.3%) of the participants reported not being aware of the use of fluoride in toothpaste.
|Table 1: The frequency and distribution of oral hygiene habits and fluoride knowledge of parents|
Click here to view
The majority of the parents (42.9%) who were familiar with the use of fluoride in toothpaste reported that their dentist had informed them of the advantages of the use of fluoridated toothpaste. Less than half (27.86%) agreed with the statement that "fluoride toothpaste is a type of toothpaste that contains fluoride." Also, 52.23% of the participants believed that brushing with fluoride toothpaste can prevent caries; however, 53.78% felt that the use of fluoride toothpaste cannot reverse early-stage caries. Nearly 60% disagreed with the statement that fluoride toothpaste can strengthen the resistance of tooth surfaces. Only one-quarter of the participants felt that the proper amount of fluoride could be helpful to health but that excess fluoride could be harmful to health. Only 11.45% of the parents received high fluoride knowledge level scores [Table 2]. The level of fluoride knowledge was significantly lower among the mothers than the fathers [Table 2]. More mothers than fathers were unaware of fluoride and its positive and negative effects.
|Table 2: Additive index of the fluoride knowledge level for questions 11-17|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The most effective mode of administering fluoride is through the regular use of fluoride toothpastes. Knowledge about fluoride toothpaste among schoolchildren, parents, and schoolteachers has increased over the years. However, the present results indicate that parents seem to have low awareness of fluoride and its effects on children's oral health. The mothers who participated in this study exhibited a significantly lower knowledge level regarding the effects of fluoride than did the fathers. The majority of the parents were not able to correctly report whether the toothpaste that their children used contained fluoride, which was evident from their responses to questions pertaining to the presence of fluoride in the toothpaste used by their children. The present results from Saudi Arabia are comparable to those reported in a study from Sweden. In the study by Jensen et al., knowledge, attitudes, and behavior concerning tooth brushing and use of fluoride toothpaste were assessed in three age groups in a Swedish population. In this study, a qualitative study design was used with the purpose of achieving a deeper understanding of the issue and pertinent information were collected using questionnaires. The results demonstrated that although participants had little knowledge about the reasons for and techniques of using fluoride toothpaste effectively, they described tooth brushing as important and the habit as a priority. Moreover, it is pertinent to mention that in the present study, the knowledge and practice related to the quantity of toothpaste used was not in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. Approximately half of the parents felt that the amount of fluoride toothpaste should be less than the size of a pea for children. These results are in accordance with those of a questionnaire study, in which 3200 individuals from two municipalities in Sweden were included. In this study, up to 94% of the respondents had a good toothpaste behavior identified as brushing at least twice a day, using at least 1 cm toothpaste. However, an expert group evaluated scientific reports and concluded that rinsing with water after brushing can reduce the benefits of fluoride toothpaste. The majority of the respondents were unaware of the beneficial effects of fluoride in preventing dental caries. Many of those who were aware of these beneficial effects reported having gained this knowledge from their treating dentists, reinforcing the role of dentists in spreading awareness of the beneficial effects of fluoride among the population. Dental professionals should emphasize the appropriate use of fluoride to prevent caries while avoiding moderate/severe fluorosis. Furthermore, it is evident that the consumption of excessive fluoride is associated with acute and chronic toxicity. It affects several organs: Brain, bones, kidney, teeth, and thyroid. In India, the harmful effects on body, such as deformation of bones in children and adults, are reported in areas of high fluoride consumption.
The advantages of fluoride use, especially in reducing the incidence of caries, need to be appreciated and compared with its negative effects., The use of fluoride toothpaste can reduce the incidence of caries by 25%, compared with the use of non-fluoride toothpaste. It has also been reported that usage of a small amount of water after brushing prolongs the retention time of fluoride in saliva and strengthens the anti-caries benefit of fluoride toothpaste. Although a lack of fluoride intake does not produce caries, fluoride does help inhibiting the disease. Fluoride can reverse tooth decay, despite the reported parental belief that fluoride does not have this effect. This result highlights the level of ignorance among parents regarding the importance of fluoride in their children's dental health. Most parents also incorrectly believed that fluoride does not improve the condition of the teeth. Although too much fluoride can lead to weakening of the bones, including teeth, sufficient amounts contribute to strengthening the teeth and preventing dental caries. Thus, it is important to increase the awareness of the benefits of fluoride and to educate the population on the correct use of an adequate quantity of fluoride. The government and other stakeholders should also participate in the education process.
The relatively simple interview used in this study was assumed to be an adequate means of determining parental concern about the appearance of their child's teeth. The authors hypothesize that an increased knowledge about the benefits of fluoride toothpaste could positively affect an individual's behavior when using fluoride toothpaste. On the basis of this research, we conclude that there is a need to increase parental knowledge of oral hygiene methods among both mothers and fathers. There is also a need to enhance parental knowledge regarding excessive fluoride intake and its harmful consequences in children's health. Both parents need a greater level of awareness regarding oral health promotion to facilitate their role in the oral health of their children. Further research is necessary to determine the levels of awareness of the proper use of fluoride and attitudes toward fluorosis in populations that are exposed to particularly high levels of environmental fluoride.
| Conclusions|| |
The level of knowledge about fluoride and its effect on children's oral health is poor among parents. Mothers had a significantly lower knowledge level regarding the effects of fluoride. The majority of the parents were not able to correctly report whether the toothpaste their children used contained fluoride. Furthermore, the majority of the respondents were unaware of the benefits of fluoride in preventing dental caries. There is a need to enhance parental knowledge regarding high fluoride intake and its harmful consequences on children's health.
Both mothers and fathers should have higher levels of awareness regarding oral health promotion to maintain optimal oral health in their children. Further research is recommended to explore the association between perceptions of fluorosis and exposure to high environmental fluoride levels, with the role played by parents in preventing this condition.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Yiamouyiannis JA. Water fluoridation and tooth decay: Results from the 1986-87 national survey of U.S. schoolchildren. Fluoride 1990;23:55-67.
Susheela AK. Prevention and Control of the Fluorosis in India. New Delhi: Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission, Ministry of Rural Development; 1999. p. 129-37.
Sherwood IA. Fluorosis varied treatment options. J Conserv Dent 2010;13:47-53.
Abanto Alvarez J, Rezende KM, Marocho SM, Alves FB, Celiberti P, Ciamponi AL. Dental fluorosis: Exposure, prevention and management. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:E103-7.
Levy SM, Hillis SL, Warren JJ, Broffitt BA, Mahbubul Islam AK, Wefel JS, et al
. Primary tooth fluorosis and fluoride intake during the first year of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002;30:286-95.
Dean HT, McKay FS. Production of mottled enamel halted by a change in common water supply. Am J Public Health Nations Health 1939;29:590-6.
Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis in permanent teeth in relation to histologic changes. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1978;6:315-28.
Richards A, Kragstrup J, Josephsen K, Fejerskov O. Dental fluorosis developed in post-secretory enamel. J Dent Res 1986;65:1406-9.
Clarkson JJ, McLoughlin J. Role of fluoride in oral health promotion. Int Dent J 2000;50:119-28.
Al-Dosari AM, Akpta ES, Al-Shalan TA, Khan N. Fluoride map of different cities, towns and villages in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J 2007;19.
Aldosari AM, Akpata ES, Khan N, Wyne AH, Al-Meheithif A. Fluoride levels in drinking water in the Central Province of Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 2003;23:20-3.
Bottenberg P, Declerck D, Ghidey W, Bogaerts K, Vanobbergen J, Martens L. Prevalence and determinants of enamel fluorosis in Flemish school children. Caries Res 2004;38:20-8.
Cochran JA, Ketley CE, Arnadóttir IB, Fernandes B, Koletsi-Kounari H, Oila AM, et al
. A comparison of the prevalence of fluorosis in 8-year-old children from seven European study sites using a standardized methodology. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32(Suppl 1):28-33.
Chankanka O, Levy SM, Warren JJ, Chalmers JM. A literature review of aesthetic perceptions of dental fluorosis and relationships with psychosocial aspects/oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2010;38:97-109.
Franzman MR, Levy SM, Warren JJ, Broffitt B. Fluoride dentifrice ingestion and fluorosis of the permanent incisors. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:645-52.
Kumar JV, Swango PA. Fluoride exposure and dental fluorosis in Newburgh and Kingston, New York: Policy implications. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:171-80.
Baskaradoss JK, Clement RB, Narayanan A. Prevalence of dental fluorosis and associated risk factors in 11-15 year old school children of Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India: A cross sectional survey. Indian J Dent Res 2008;19:297-303.
McKnight CB, Levy SM, Cooper SE, Jakobsen JR. A pilot study of esthetic perceptions of dental fluorosis vs. selected other dental conditions. ASDC J Dent Child 1998;65:233-8, 229.
Bårdsen A, Klock KS, Bjorvatn K. Dental fluorosis among persons exposed to high- and low-fluoride drinking water in western Norway. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:259-67.
Rodd HD, Davidson LE. The aesthetic management of severe dental fluorosis in the young patient. Dent Update 1997;24:408-11.
Newton JT, Prabhu N, Robinson PG. Your Teeth Make a First Impression. (Summary Prepared by Dr. Caroline L Pankhurst on behalf of the UK Forum for Oral and Dental Research). UK Forum for Oral and Dental Research; 2002.
Astrøm AN, Mashoto K. Determinants of self-rated oral health status among school children in northern Tanzania. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12:90-100.
Liu M, Zhu L, Zhang B, Petersen PE. Changing use and knowledge of fluoride toothpaste by schoolchildren, parents and schoolteachers in Beijing, China. Int Dent J 2007;57:187-94.
Jensen O, Gabre P, Sköld UM, Birkhed D. Fluoride toothpaste and toothbrushing; knowledge, attitudes and behaviour among Swedish adolescents and adults. Swed Dent J 2011;35:203-13.
World Health Organization. Environmental Health Criteria for Fluorides and Fluorosis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1991.
Jensen O, Gabre P, Sköld UM, Birkhed D. Is the use of fluoride toothpaste optimal? Knowledge, attitudes and behaviour concerning fluoride toothpaste and toothbrushing in different age groups in Sweden. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012;40:175-84.
Pitts N, Duckworth RM, Marsh P, Mutti B, Parnell C, Zero D. Post-brushing rinsing for the control of dental caries: Exploration of the available evidence to establish what advice we should give our patients. Br Dent J 2012;212:315-20.
Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003: Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st
Century - The approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003;31(Suppl 1):3-23.
Petersen PE. Challenges to improvement of oral health in the 21st
century--the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Int Dent J 2004;54(Suppl 1):329-43.
Clarkson JE, Ellwood RP, Chandler RE. A comprehensive summary of fluoride dentifrice caries clinical trials. Am J Dent 1993;6:S59-106.
Richards A, Fejerskov O, Larsen M. Fluoride concentrations in dentifrices in relation to efficacy, sideeffects and salivary clearance. In: Embery G, Rølla G, editors. Clinical and Biological Aspects of Dentifrices. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 73-90.
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Parents Knowledge and Behavior Regarding Fluoride Use for Their Children
| ||Mariana Caramida, Mihaela Adina Dumitrache, Ioanina Parlatescu, Cristina Pîrvu, Laura Tribu? |
| ||Timisoara Medical Journal. 2021; 2021(1): 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||VELILERIN OKULLARDA FLORÜRLÜ VERNIK UYGULAMASI PROGRAMI HAKKINDA TUTUM VE YAKLASIMLARININ DEGERLENDIRILMESI
| ||Isil Özgül KALYONCU,Seda HAS,Figen EREN GIRAY,Betül KARGÜL |
| ||Atatürk Üniversitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; : 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||3205 |
| Printed||350 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||264 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||2 |