Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions| Reviewers

Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 257    
     


 
Table of Contents   
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 393-403
Estimation of serum, salivary, and gingival crevicular uric acid of individuals with and without periodontal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis


1 Department of Preventive Dentistry, Annamuthajiya Campus, Riyadh Elm University (REU), Riyadh 11681, Saudi Arabia
2 Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission01-Apr-2022
Date of Decision25-May-2022
Date of Acceptance14-Jun-2022
Date of Web Publication29-Aug-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rabiya B Uppin
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Annamuthajiya Campus, Riyadh Elm University (REU), Post Box 84891, Riyadh 11681
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_84_22

Rights and Permissions

   Abstract 

Introduction: Uric acid (UA) levels in serum, salivary, and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) may be associated with periodontal diseases. Hence, this study aimed to estimate the UA concentration in serum, saliva, and GCF of periodontal disease and non-periodontal disease subjects by conducting a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the reported studies. Materials and Methods: A review of the available literature was searched in the electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane, Science Direct, and EBSCO for the relevant publications. All the related case–control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies reporting the UA levels in the blood, salivary, and GCF between periodontal disease patients and healthy controls were analyzed. Significant heterogeneity was observed in the studies. Hence, a continuous random-effects model was used. The findings are described in forest plots with the point estimations and 95% confidence interval (CI). A value of P less than 5% was considered as a significant heterogeneity test. Results: Of the initial 166 study titles screened, 14 reported papers were eligible for quantitative review. The subgroup analysis of serum UA revealed a mean difference of 0.299 (95% CI: 0.029–0.569, I2=85.64%, P<0.001), indicating an increase in the UA levels in periodontal disease. However, the subgroup analysis by salivary UA demonstrated a mean difference of −0.783 (95% CI: −1.577–0.011, I2= 94.62%, P<0.001), suggesting a lower side of the UA level in periodontal diseases. The subgroup analysis based on case–control studies showed a mean difference of 0.004 (95% CI: −0.286–0.294, I2=84.99%, P<0.001), indicating no changes in UA levels in periodontal disease. On the contrary, cohort studies and cross-sectional studies showed a mean difference : 95% CI: −1.016, −3.272–1.241, I2=97.84%, P<0.001 and 95%: −1.230, −4.410–1.949, I2=97.7%, P<0.001, indicating reduction in UA levels in periodontal disease cases. Conclusion: The current review suggests an increase in the serum UA levels in periodontal disease than in healthy controls. Contrarily, the salivary UA levels decreased in periodontal disease patients. It is unknown why UA levels are opposite in the blood and saliva of periodontal disease patients requiring further explanation.


Keywords: GCF, healthy, non-periodontal disease, periodontal disease, periodontitis, saliva, serum, uric acid


How to cite this article:
Uppin RB, Varghese SS. Estimation of serum, salivary, and gingival crevicular uric acid of individuals with and without periodontal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2022;12:393-403

How to cite this URL:
Uppin RB, Varghese SS. Estimation of serum, salivary, and gingival crevicular uric acid of individuals with and without periodontal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 5];12:393-403. Available from: https://www.jispcd.org/text.asp?2022/12/4/393/354975



   Introduction Top


Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammatory condition that affects 10–15% of the world’s population. It is the most common cause of tooth loss that damages the surrounding and supporting structures of the tooth.[1],[2],[3],[4] Clinical expressions are based on the presence or absence of inflammation, pocket depth, gingival, and bone losses.[1],[2] As bacterial species evolve faster than human hosts, the immunological system that maintains commensal bacteria’s ecological balance shifts to maintain homeostasis.[5] In the case of periodontal disease, pathogenesis is interceded by the inflammatory responses of the bacteria present in the dental plaque.[6] Thus, immune response and host susceptibility modified by environmental factors regulate the progression of periodontal disease.[7] Various studies have demonstrated that oxidative stress and total antioxidant capacity play a vital role in periodontal disease pathogenesis.[1],[2],[8],[9],[10] Any imbalance between the pro-oxidants and antioxidants results in oxidative stress.[1],[2],[11]

Uric acid (UA) (C5H4N4O3) is a heterocyclic organic compound having a molecular weight of 168 Da. It is the final product of an exogenous pool of purines and endogenous purine metabolism.[12] The standard reference value of UA among women is 1.5–6.0 mg/dL, and in men, it varies from 2.5 to 7.0 mg/dL. UA demonstrates low solubility in water, and in humans mean concentration of UA in the blood is close to the solubility limit of 6.8 mg/dL. Usually, most daily UA removal occurs through the kidneys.[13] Saliva has become a promising fluid in research and clinical diagnosis. It is regarded as an essential biomarker complementing the diagnosis of some systemic diseases.[14],[15] Oxidative stress and antioxidant levels in saliva have been reported in periodontitis associated with many systemic conditions.[16],[17],[18] UA, albumin, and ascorbic acids are the main antioxidant constituents of saliva.[19] However, UA in saliva has clinical significance in monitoring oxidative stress.[20]

Oral diseases affecting the alveolar bone or teeth have increased blood UA levels.[21],[22],[23] Recent studies relate elevated UA levels to periodontitis.[21],[24],[25] UA contributes approximately 70–85% of the total antioxidative potential of resting and stimulated saliva from healthy and periodontally compromised subjects.[26],[27] In addition, salivary UA and plasma UA concentrations are similar without any significant diurnal variation.[28] However, controversy surrounds estimating UA levels in saliva and periodontal disease. UA is comparatively less among periodontitis patients than healthy controls.[29] In contrast, Moore et al.[26] have reported that increased salivary concentrations of UA suggest oxidative stress and the progression of periodontal disease.

In order to acquire further knowledge of UA levels in serum, saliva, and GCF in periodontal diseases and health, there is a need to examine the published literature to ascertain its role in systemic and oral health and disease. Therefore, the current study aims to estimate the UA concentration in serum, saliva, and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of periodontal disease and non-periodontal disease (healthy) subjects by conducting a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the reported studies.


   Materials and Methods Top


To achieve the objective of this systematic review, a focused research question was formulated with the following components:

  • (i) Cases: Individuals/patients with periodontal disease;


  • (ii) Comparison: Individuals without periodontal disease or healthy subjects;


  • (iii) Outcome: concentration of UA in serum or saliva or GCF.


Focused question

Does the UA levels in saliva or serum or GCF differ among the patients with periodontal disease compared with non-periodontal disease (healthy)?

Periodontal disease included both periodontitis and gingivitis as defined below:

Periodontitis: Periodontitis included a minimum of two areas of different teeth having clinical attachment level (CAL): at least two sites on different teeth with CAL ≥ 6 mm and at least one site with probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 4 mm[30] or a minimum of two areas of non-adjacent teeth proximal attachment loss ≥3 mm,[31] or community periodontal index (CPI) score of 4 in at least one quadrant.[32] However, in situations with no reported CAL or PPD, a radiographic alveolar bone loss was ≥ 30% of root length or ≥ 5 mm in at least two teeth.

Gingivitis included a minimum of 30% of sites with bleeding on probing or mean bleeding index = 1,[33] or at least 15 bleeding sites.[34] In some cases, gingivitis refers to unspecified gingival inflammation. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed in this study in conducting systematic review and meta-analysis [Figure 1].
Figure 1: PRIMSA flow chart

Click here to view


Literature search strategy and selection of publications

In July 2021, searches were conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane, Science Direct, and EBSCO databases to find the most relevant papers published. The following keywords were used in the search strategy: Uric acid, periodontitis patients, non-periodontitis, serum, saliva, GCF using an advanced search strategy. A single calibrated reviewer independently selected the articles. The initial screening was performed by reading the titles and abstracts. After reading the complete text, the decision was taken if the information was insufficient.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were all articles identified in the database searches, filtered by “humans” but without filtering by publication date or age of subjects. In addition, studies linking oral disease to other types of systemic disease were included in the review. Literature reviews, case reports, and animal-based studies were excluded. Studies that did not address oral disease lacked a control group or examined variables other than the objective of the present review were also excluded. Moreover, publications other than the English language were translated into English and included in the study.

Data extraction

Descriptive information, including the study author, year, study design, sample, UA measuring method, comparison group, the total number of cases, mean and standard deviation values of UA in cases, total controls, mean and standard deviation values of UA in controls, and significant findings, was extracted from each study. The summary of studies and outcome measures are shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Summary of studies and outcome measures included in the meta-analysis

Click here to view


Quality assessment

The quality of each study was measured on the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale for case–control, cohort, cross-sectional studies (NOS), and randomized controlled interventions. These consist of several items, divided into three groups: selection of study groups, comparability, and exposure or interesting findings in the groups, respectively. The stars awarded for each quality group provide a rapid visual assessment. For example, the scoring system can award 10 stars to the highest quality cross-sectional, case–control studies, and randomized controlled interventions. However, 13 stars for the assessment of cohort studies were considered [Table 2].
Table 2: The Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale

Click here to view


Subgroup analysis

Studies assessing the relationship between UA levels and periodontal disease have reported conflicting findings. So, we performed a subgroup analysis based on the studies of UA levels in saliva or serum and the study designs.

Statistical analysis

The results of studies were combined on the basis of the sample size, study design, salivary and serum UA’s mean and standard deviations. The heterogeneity index (I2) was used to assess the heterogeneity of the studies. Since significant heterogeneity was observed in the studies, a continuous random-effects model was used. The findings are described in forest plots (the point estimations and their 95% CI). A value of P less than 5% was considered as a significant heterogeneity test. All the statistical analyses were performed using OpenMeta [Analyst] software program developed by the Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health (Brown University, School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA).


   Results Top


Of the 166 identified study titles, 45 records were considered eligible after initial screening. After the full-text reading, 31 papers were excluded due to: (1) not reporting periodontal disease as an outcome of interest (n = 10); (2) studies without control group UA measurements (n = 10); (3) narrative reviews (n = 4); (4) analysis not related to the variables of interest (n = 5); and (5) no mention of the exact value of UA in cases and control groups (2). Hence, 14 studies were included with repeated articles separately for salivary and serum UA in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. These studies were published in different countries of the world. The study participants ranged from 7 patients in a study by Moore et al.[26] to 18,538 individuals in Tu et al.[35] Nine case–control, two cross-sectional, one prospective cohort, and two randomized controlled interventions were included in this review. The study conducted by Shetty et al.[36] was repeated twice due to the comparison of the salivary UA between normal individuals and periodontitis patients without pregnancy; second-time uric acid data were compared between women with and without pregnancy. Similarly, Narendra et al.’s study counted once for the serum UA and the GCF to compare healthy and periodontitis patients.[37] The periodontal disease criteria were based on clinical and few studies on radiographic evidence.

The quality ratings of the study showed that the total number of stars ranged from 6 to 9 for all the studies. Five studies qualified for the highest rating of nine stars. On the contrary, studies reported by Moore et al.,[26] Mathur et al.,[38] Novakovic et al.,[39] and Cao et al.[24] were assigned a score of 6. Similarly, studies conducted by Tu et al.,[35] Miricescu et al.,[40] Banu et al.,[21] Fatima et al.,[41] and Babaei et al.[25] were assigned an 8-star rating, as shown in [Table 2].

Subgroup analysis based on serum and salivary uric acid

The subgroup analysis of serum UA revealed a mean difference of 0.299 (95% CI: 0.029–0.569, I2=85.64%, P<0.001) [Figure 2], indicating an increase in the UA levels in periodontal disease. However, the subgroup analysis by salivary UA demonstrated a mean difference of −0.783 (95% CI: −1.577–0.011, I2= 94.62%, P<0.001) [Figure 3], suggesting a lower side of the UA level in periodontal diseases.
Figure 2: Subgroup analysis based on serum uric acid estimation

Click here to view
Figure 3: Subgroup analysis based on salivary uric acid estimation

Click here to view


Subgroup analysis based on study designs

The subgroup analysis based on case–control studies showed a mean difference of 0.004 (95% CI: −0.286–0.294, I2=84.99%, P<0.001) [Figure 4], suggesting no changes in UA levels in periodontal disease. On the contrary, cohort studies and cross-sectional studies showed a mean difference of 95% CI: −1.016, −3.272–1.241, I2=97.84%, P<0.001 [Figure 5] and 95%: −1.230, −4.410–1.949, I2=97.7%, P<0.001 [Figure 6], indicating reduction in UA levels in periodontal disease cases.
Figure 4: Subgroup analysis based on case–control studies

Click here to view
Figure 5: Subgroup analysis based on cohort studies

Click here to view
Figure 6: Subgroup analysis based on cross-sectional studies

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The study revealed contradictory findings of UA levels in serum and saliva of periodontal disease patients compared with healthy subjects, as evidenced by this meta-analysis. The UA levels in serum/plasma of the periodontal disease patients were increased compared with their healthy counterparts. Studies relating UA levels in serum/plasma with periodontal disease conditions are listed in [Table 1].

Human observational studies commonly showed increased UA levels in the circulation (serum or plasma) in the presence of periodontitis with or without comorbidities.[21],[24],[35] Contrarily, one interventional study considered in this review found a decrease in the UA in the serum of periodontitis patients.[25] While Narendra et al.[37] reported no change, Tu et al.[35] noted a marginal reduction in serum UA levels in periodontal disease patients compared with the reference group.

These data support the notion that there is a positive connection between increased blood UA levels and periodontitis in a normouricemic condition. Notably, no research has examined the relationship between blood UA levels and periodontitis in a hyperuricemic population. In addition, no studies have been conducted to determine the impact of UA-lowering treatment on periodontal health. At the same time, the cutoff thresholds for defining UA levels in serum/plasma are arbitrary.[42]

Contradictory to the findings in serum/plasma, UA levels were decreased in the saliva of periodontitis patients in our study.[29],[40],[41] These inconsistent results could be attributed to the different organic origins of the serum and salivary UA. It has been hypothesized that although the UA synthesis is increased in periodontitis, the much-expanded oral biofilm may consume significantly more purine and UA through bacterial mechanisms.[43] This concept might explain why periodontitis patients had higher purine catabolism in GCF but a lower UA level than periodontally healthy controls.[44]

Of the nine studies comparing salivary UA levels between periodontitis and healthy subjects, three studies reported a decrease in salivary UA levels.[29],[40],[41] Mathur et al.[36] noted that the non-surgical periodontal treatment raised salivary UA levels in individuals with gingivitis/periodontitis.

In a case–control study, Shetty and Talaviya[29] compared the salivary UA level between periodontitis patients and healthy controls using Ramfjord index teeth. The results revealed comparatively lower UA values among periodontitis patients than the normal individuals without any significant difference. However, the study was conducted with a smaller sample size, thereby limiting the external validity of the findings.

Miricescu et al.[40] explored the likely relationship between salivary markers of oxidative stress and alveolar bone loss in chronic periodontitis patients and healthy controls. UA levels were significantly decreased in patients with chronic periodontitis than in controls. Moreover, a significant negative correlation was observed between salivary UA and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX I) and between metalloproteinases-8 (MMP-8) and UA, suggesting alveolar bone loss. Likewise, Fatima et al.[41] compared the salivary UA level of healthy individuals and smokers and non-smokers with periodontitis. The study findings indicated that the patients with periodontal disease, either alone or in conjunction with a smoking habit, had decreased salivary UA levels. Interestingly, smoking did not result in additional UA depletion in periodontitis patients. However, one of the study’s limitations is the smaller sample size.

In contrast to the studies that pointed out a decrease in salivary UA among periodontitis patients, some authors reported no change in UA.[26],[36] Moore et al.[26] argued that changes in antioxidant status or levels could not detect the increased free radical generation in periodontal disease. Increased GCF production associated with gingivitis and periodontitis may potentially compensate for the local antioxidant deficiency. Additionally, Shetty and colleagues[36] reported that normotensive healthy and periodontitis pregnant women have comparable UA levels. However, a significant difference in UA was observed among pregnant women, especially between the normotensive periodontitis group and preeclamptic periodontitis group, suggesting that periodontal disease may be a risk factor for the severity, development, and possible onset of preeclampsia due to decreased antioxidant capacity or increased oxidative stress.

It has been pointed out that the antioxidant enzyme is activated in inflammatory pathways to preserve connective tissue from degradation. Therefore, antioxidant activity, especially superoxide dismutase, may be increased in gingival connective tissue to protect it from degradation without affecting its level in GCF.[45] However, only one study in our review compared the UA level in GCF of chronic and acute periodontitis patients with that of the healthy controls. The results revealed significantly higher UA levels in both periodontitis types than in healthy controls. However, acute and chronic periodontitis patients showed inconsistent UA levels in GCF and serum.[37]

It has been hypothesized that immuno-metabolic dysregulations have a critical role in exacerbating periodontitis in certain metabolic illnesses such as metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.[46],[47] Hyperuricemia is also associated with or is a risk factor for certain metabolic disorders. Periodontitis, hyperuricemia, and the cluster of metabolic disorders seem to have a complex interaction with hyperuricemia, a potentially increasing periodontal risk via the mediation of or as a consequence of these metabolic diseases.[42] In line with this, our review included studies irrespective of the underlying health conditions of the study participants that could have affected the serum and salivary UA levels.

Strength and limitations of the study

The strength of this study is the use of eminent databases for literature search, well-defined criteria for inclusion/exclusion, and extensive use of reference lists.

Since our review included most case–control and cohort studies, recall or selection bias might have affected the results and summary estimates. Additionally, the inclusion of two cross-sectional studies may be one of the limitations of the review since no cause and effect between UA levels and periodontitis could be explained. Despite best attempts to perform a comprehensive search and the absence of statistical evidence of bias, individual studies with quality issues may nevertheless be helpful.


   Conclusion Top


Within the limitations, this systematic review with meta-analysis suggests an increase in the serum UA levels in periodontal disease cases than in healthy controls. Contrarily, the salivary UA levels decreased in periodontal disease patients. It is unknown why UA levels are opposite in blood and saliva in periodontal disease patients. Subgroup analysis based on the study type revealed varying UA levels in saliva and blood in periodontal disease patients when compared with the healthy controls. Further studies with large sample sizes with prospective study designs are needed to establish cause and effect relations between UA levels in serum or saliva and periodontal disease.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Research and Innovation Center of Riyadh Elm University for supporting this project.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ contributions

Rabiya B. Uppin: Concepts, design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, data acquisition, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, manuscript review. Sheeja S. Varghese: Concepts, design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, manuscript editing, manuscript review.

Ethical policy and institutional review board statement

The study proposal was registered in the research and innovation center of Riyadh Elm University (FRP/2021/426/722).

Patient declaration of consent

Not applicable.

Data availability statement

Not applicable.

 
   References Top

1.
Roi A, Rusu LC, Roi CI, Luca RE, Boia S, Munteanu RI A new approach for the diagnosis of systemic and oral diseases based on salivary biomolecules. Dis Markers 2019;2019:8761860.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Zieniewska I, Maciejczyk M, Zalewska A The effect of selected dental materials used in conservative dentistry, endodontics, surgery, and orthodontics as well as during the periodontal treatment on the redox balance in the oral cavity. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:9684. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249684.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Buzalaf MAR, Ortiz AC, Carvalho TS, Fideles SOM, Araújo TT, Moraes SM, et al. Saliva as a diagnostic tool for dental caries, periodontal disease and cancer: Is there a need for more biomarkers? Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2020;20:543-55.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Toczewska J, Konopka T Activity of enzymatic antioxidants in periodontitis: A systematic overview of the literature. Dent Med Probl 2019;56:419-26.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Tetyczka C, Hartl S, Jeitler R, Absenger-Novak M, Meindl C, Fröhlich E, et al. Cytokine-mediated inflammation in the oral cavity and its effect on lipid nanocarriers. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2021;11:1330. doi: 10.3390/nano11051330.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kurgan S, Kantarci A Molecular basis for immunohistochemical and inflammatory changes during progression of gingivitis to periodontitis. Periodontol 2000 2018;76:51-67.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Yang B, Pang X, Li Z, Chen Z, Wang Y Immunomodulation in the treatment of periodontitis: Progress and perspectives. Front Immunol 2021;12:781378.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Altıngöz SM, Kurgan Ş, Önder C, Serdar MA, Ünlütürk U, Uyanık M, et al. Salivary and serum oxidative stress biomarkers and advanced glycation end products in periodontitis patients with or without diabetes: A cross-sectional study. J Periodontol 2021;92:1274-85.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Chen M, Cai W, Zhao S, Shi L, Chen Y, Li X, et al. Oxidative stress-related biomarkers in saliva and gingival crevicular fluid associated with chronic periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2019;46:608-22.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Wang Y, Andrukhov O, Rausch-Fan X Oxidative stress and antioxidant system in periodontitis. Front Physiol 2017;8:910.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Mendez KN, Hoare A, Soto C, Bugueño I, Olivera M, Meneses C, et al. Variability in genomic and virulent properties of Porphyromonas gingivalis strains isolated from healthy and severe chronic periodontitis individuals. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2019;9:246.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Gulab A, Torres R, Pelayo J, Lo KB, Shahzad A, Pradhan S, et al. Uric acid as a cardiorenal mediator: Pathogenesis and mechanistic insights. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2021;19:547-56.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Jin M, Yang F, Yang I, Yin Y, Luo JJ, Wang H, et al. Uric acid, hyperuricemia and vascular diseases. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2012;17:656-69.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Dawes C, Wong DTW Role of saliva and salivary diagnostics in the advancement of oral health. J Dent Res 2019;98:133-41.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Zhang CZ, Cheng XQ, Li JY, Zhang P, Yi P, Xu X, et al. Saliva in the diagnosis of diseases. Int J Oral Sci 2016;8:133-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Atabay VE, Lutfioğlu M, Avci B, Sakallioglu EE, Aydoğdu A Obesity and oxidative stress in patients with different periodontal status: A case–control study. J Periodontal Res 2017;52:51-60.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Zambon M, Mandò C, Lissoni A, Anelli GM, Novielli C, Cardellicchio M, et al. Inflammatory and oxidative responses in pregnancies with obesity and periodontal disease. Reprod Sci 2018;25:1474-84.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Nguyen TT, Ngo LQ, Promsudthi A, Surarit R Salivary oxidative stress biomarkers in chronic periodontitis and acute coronary syndrome. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:2345-53.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Diab-Ladki R, Pellat B, Chahine R Decrease in the total antioxidant activity of saliva in patients with periodontal diseases. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:103-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lippi G, Montagnana M, Franchini M, Favaloro EJ, Targher G The paradoxical relationship between serum uric acid and cardiovascular disease. Clin Chim Acta 2008;392:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Banu S, Jabir NR, Mohan R, Manjunath NC, Kamal MA, Kumar KR, et al. Correlation of toll-like receptor 4, interleukin-18, transaminases, and uric acid in patients with chronic periodontitis and healthy adults. J Periodontol 2015;86:431-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Prieto AKC, Gomes-Filho JE, Azuma MM, Sivieri-Araújo G, Narciso LG, Souza JC, et al. Influence of apical periodontitis on stress oxidative parameters in diabetic rats. J Endod 2017;43:1651-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Zhou J, Hu H, Huang R A pilot study of the metabolomic profiles of saliva from female orthodontic patients with external apical root resorption. Clin Chim Acta 2018;478:188-93.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Cao YL, Qiao M, Xu ZH, Zou GM, Ma LL, Li WG, et al. [The clinical study of IgA nephropathy with severe chronic periodontitis and aggressive periodontitis]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2016;96:9-13.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Babaei H, Forouzandeh F, Maghsoumi-Norouzabad L, Yousefimanesh HA, Ravanbakhsh M, Zare Javid A Effects of chicory leaf extract on serum oxidative stress markers, lipid profile and periodontal status in patients with chronic periodontitis. J Am Coll Nutr 2018;37:479-86.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Moore S, Calder KA, Miller NJ, Rice-Evans CA Antioxidant activity of saliva and periodontal disease. Free Radic Res 1994;21:417-25.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Nagler RM, Klein I, Zarzhevsky N, Drigues N, Reznick AZ Characterization of the differentiated antioxidant profile of human saliva. Free Radic Biol Med 2002;32:268-77.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Schermann JM, Meunier J, Ricordel I, Masbernard A, Giudicelli C [Comparative study of uric acid concentration in serum and saliva of healthy or hyperuricemic subjects]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 1977;35:467-72.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Shetty M, Talaviya D Determination of salivary uric acid levels in periodontitis and health: A case–control study. J Health Allied Sci NU 2012;02:54-6.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Page RC, Eke PI Case definitions for use in population-based surveillance of periodontitis. J Periodontol 2007;78: 1387-99.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Tonetti MS, Claffey N; European Workshop in Periodontology Group C. Advances in the progression of periodontitis and proposal of definitions of a periodontitis case and disease progression for use in risk factor research. Group C Consensus Report of the 5th European Workshop in Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32(Suppl. 6):210-3.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods [Internet]. World Health Organization; 1997. p. 6-39.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Silness J, Loe H Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-35.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Biesbrock AR, Bartizek RD, Gerlach RW, Terézhalmy GT Oral hygiene regimens, plaque control, and gingival health: A two-month clinical trial with antimicrobial agents. J Clin Dent 2007;18:101-5.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Tu YK, D’Aiuto F, Lin HJ, Chen YW, Chien KL Relationship between metabolic syndrome and diagnoses of periodontal diseases among participants in a large Taiwanese cohort. J Clin Periodontol 2013;40:994-1000.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Shetty MS, Ramesh A, Shetty PK, Agumbe P Salivary and serum antioxidants in women with preeclampsia with or without periodontal disease. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2018;68:33-8.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Narendra S, Das UK, Tripathy SK, Sahani NC Superoxide dismutase, uric acid, total antioxidant status, and lipid peroxidation assay in chronic and aggressive periodontitis patients. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19:874-80.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Mathur A, Mathur L, Manohar B, Mathur H, Shankarapillai R, Shetty N, et al. Antioxidant therapy as monotherapy or as an adjunct to treatment of periodontal diseases. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17:21-4.  Back to cited text no. 38
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
39.
Novakovic N, Todorovic T, Rakic M, Milinkovic I, Dozic I, Jankovic S, et al. Salivary antioxidants as periodontal biomarkers in evaluation of tissue status and treatment outcome. J Periodontal Res 2014;49:129-36.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Miricescu D, Totan A, Calenic B, Mocanu B, Didilescu A, Mohora M, et al. Salivary biomarkers: Relationship between oxidative stress and alveolar bone loss in chronic periodontitis. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72:42-7.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Fatima G, Uppin RB, Kasagani S, Tapshetty R, Rao A Comparison of salivary uric acid level among healthy individuals without periodontitis with that of smokers and non-smokers with periodontitis. J Adv Oral Res 2016;7:24-8.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Chen ZY, Ye LW, Zhao L, Liang ZJ, Yu T, Gao J Hyperuricemia as a potential plausible risk factor for periodontitis. Med Hypotheses 2020;137:109591.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Woolfolk CA, Downard JS Distribution of xanthine oxidase and xanthine dehydrogenase specificity types among bacteria. J Bacteriol 1977;130:1175-91.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Barnes VM, Teles R, Trivedi HM, Devizio W, Xu T, Mitchell MW, et al. Acceleration of purine degradation by periodontal diseases. J Dent Res 2009;88:851-5.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Akalin FA, Toklu E, Renda N Analysis of superoxide dismutase activity levels in gingiva and gingival crevicular fluid in patients with chronic periodontitis and periodontally healthy controls. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:238-43.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Chapple IL, Genco R; Working Group 2 of the Joint EFP/AAP Workshop. Diabetes and periodontal diseases: Consensus report of the joint EFP/AAP WORKSHOP on Periodontitis and Systemic Diseases. J Periodontol 2013;84:S106-12.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Arboleda S, Vargas M, Losada S, Pinto A Review of obesity and periodontitis: An epidemiological view. Br Dent J 2019;227:235-9.  Back to cited text no. 47
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (3,395 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed940    
    Printed72    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded165    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal