Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2018  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 343--348

A prospective comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for maxillofacial space infections


V Ramesh Babu1, Srikanth Ikkurthi2, Dinesh Kumar Perisetty3, K. A. Saran Babu4, Mahammad Rasool5, Shanawaz Shaik1 
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, Andhra  Pradesh, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, CKS Theja Institute of Dental Sciences Research, Tirupati, Andhra  Pradesh, India
3 Department of Endodontics and Operative Dentistry, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, Andhra  Pradesh, India
4 Department of Prosthodontics, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, Andhra  Pradesh, India
5 Department of Prosthodontics, CKS Theja Institute of Dental Sciences Research, Tirupati, Andhra  Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Srikanth Ikkurthi
1-44, Plot No: 36-B, Jayanagar Colony, Near Bairagipatteda, Tirupati - 517 501, Andhra Pradesh
India

AimsandObjectives: The aim of this work was to assess the advantages and disadvantages of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus computed tomography (CT) in the initial evaluation of maxillofacial space infections by comparing various parameters of the imaging studies and comparing them on a three-point scale. Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated 15 patients with head and neck space infections. All patients underwent CT and MRI using similar slice thickness. We reviewed all imaging studies with special attention to location, extension, source of infection, extent of bone involvement, odontogenic or nonodontogenic, and presence of gas/calcium in the lesions. All the parameters were graded based on a three-point scale and were compared statistically by paired t-test. Results: According to the results we arrived at, MRI was superior to CT in regard to lesion conspicuity, extension, number of anatomic spaces involved, and source on infection. Although not significant, MRI detected a greater number of abscess collections. However, in the aspects of detection of intralesional gas and calcium and motion artifacts, CT was superior to MRI. However, these advantages of CT over MRI are not significantly better than those of MRI. Conclusion: MRI was considered superior to CT in the initial evaluation of head and neck space infections. Our study thus concludes that MRI may be used as the primary modality to evaluate patients with head and neck infections when clinically feasible.


How to cite this article:
Babu V R, Ikkurthi S, Perisetty DK, Babu KA, Rasool M, Shaik S. A prospective comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for maxillofacial space infections.J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2018;8:343-348


How to cite this URL:
Babu V R, Ikkurthi S, Perisetty DK, Babu KA, Rasool M, Shaik S. A prospective comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for maxillofacial space infections. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Oct 23 ];8:343-348
Available from: https://www.jispcd.org/article.asp?issn=2231-0762;year=2018;volume=8;issue=4;spage=343;epage=348;aulast=Babu;type=0